Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Feats & Fighters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 5534948" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>Ah, so the same basic idea as a higher-level knight knocking an enemy prone (or whatever) with a Power Strike tacked onto an MBA.</p><p></p><p>In the sense that it's easier to eat the auto-damage than the OA. I get it.</p><p></p><p>There is an interesting difference in what's worse. If a Fighter has manged to mark a couple of enemies, and they decide to beat on one of his allies, he can mark-punish at most one of them, and the mark punishment is just an MBA, which is not particularly fearsome. If one ignores the mark, the other might as well do so, also. Walking away is a bad option, since it's an MBA with a bonus that stops movement. With the Knight, the mark-punishment is a stance-enhanced MBA that damages on a miss, and both enemies must face it, so taking a stance-enhanced MBA, without the damage on a miss for running away from him, before attacking the ally is slightly less painful. If the two enemies go for the path of least resistance in both cases, the Knight makes two enhanced MBAs against them, and the Fighter makes one ordinary MBA - but both are at -2. Of course, if the fighter has only attacked one of the enemies in question, only one takes the -2 - and, if he's attacked a different enemy entirely, they're not marked. </p><p></p><p>But, none of that matters, because taking a Knight's enhanced MBA, that can be further buffed with power attack, is no incentive whatsoever. While taking a -2 from the fighter, and at most 1 ordinary MBA is terrifying.</p><p></p><p>Each defender is different, and the way DMs react to their marks (or auras) can certainly highlight different aspects of how they defend. It sounds like, in Aegeri's game, Knights are basically psuedo-strikers who are constantly handed lots of OAs, because no one wants to stand next to them, and defenders in general are nothing but punching bags that get shoved around and dazed every single round, and never do anything more than hand out a -2 to hit, because mark punishment never, ever happens. Not how I generally see the Defender role playing out, but different play styles emphasize different things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 5534948, member: 996"] Ah, so the same basic idea as a higher-level knight knocking an enemy prone (or whatever) with a Power Strike tacked onto an MBA. In the sense that it's easier to eat the auto-damage than the OA. I get it. There is an interesting difference in what's worse. If a Fighter has manged to mark a couple of enemies, and they decide to beat on one of his allies, he can mark-punish at most one of them, and the mark punishment is just an MBA, which is not particularly fearsome. If one ignores the mark, the other might as well do so, also. Walking away is a bad option, since it's an MBA with a bonus that stops movement. With the Knight, the mark-punishment is a stance-enhanced MBA that damages on a miss, and both enemies must face it, so taking a stance-enhanced MBA, without the damage on a miss for running away from him, before attacking the ally is slightly less painful. If the two enemies go for the path of least resistance in both cases, the Knight makes two enhanced MBAs against them, and the Fighter makes one ordinary MBA - but both are at -2. Of course, if the fighter has only attacked one of the enemies in question, only one takes the -2 - and, if he's attacked a different enemy entirely, they're not marked. But, none of that matters, because taking a Knight's enhanced MBA, that can be further buffed with power attack, is no incentive whatsoever. While taking a -2 from the fighter, and at most 1 ordinary MBA is terrifying. Each defender is different, and the way DMs react to their marks (or auras) can certainly highlight different aspects of how they defend. It sounds like, in Aegeri's game, Knights are basically psuedo-strikers who are constantly handed lots of OAs, because no one wants to stand next to them, and defenders in general are nothing but punching bags that get shoved around and dazed every single round, and never do anything more than hand out a -2 to hit, because mark punishment never, ever happens. Not how I generally see the Defender role playing out, but different play styles emphasize different things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Feats & Fighters
Top