Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Feats still optional in 1D&D: and other notes from the survey results
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quickleaf" data-source="post: 8843882" data-attributes="member: 20323"><p>Well, that's not what I heard.</p><p></p><p>Starting at 3:00 (verbatim, <strong>emphasis mine</strong>) <em>"Some groups prefer not to use feats, which is one of the reasons why we're very carefully threading this needle of: Alright, <strong>you get this free one</strong>. So we're not going to require you to engage with the feat system <strong>repeatedly</strong> unless you really want to. But we also want to give you that <strong>taste</strong>, so that you can then make an informed decision about whether you later engage with feats."</em></p><p></p><p>In the recent <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kLAwL9yAtA" target="_blank">video</a>, Jeremy Crawford describes the "background feat at 1st level" being wildly popular in their survey and that it scored the highest (almost 90% satisfaction) of their first One D&D Unearthed Arcana playtest survey. (As I note below, this may be flawed)</p><p></p><p>He explains that anything scoring this high is very likely to see further development in the actual game. </p><p></p><p>It's hard to not view this in light of something Jeremy said back in 2018: that a majority of D&D players don't use feats. [MEDIA=twitter]969020122177331200[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>As [USER=11365]@Alphastream[/USER] said very well, this may be a flawed premise because there was no question asking "do you want bonus feats at 1st level?" (besides writing in your own comment in the text field at the end, which I did). There's a trend with these surveys to narrow the field of questioning to rating very specific features/feats/spells/races without asking the bigger question: do we even want this?</p><p></p><p>So, that "~90% satisfaction with background feats at 1st level" <em>might </em>be true – there certainly are a lot more players who are younger than me getting into D&D, and maybe they really connect with the power fantasy implied by a bonus background feat – but until they actually ask that question, we don't really know.</p><p></p><p>Honestly, I wish I'd been saving these surveys to look back at, but I just haven't had the wherewithal. </p><p></p><p>I want to believe that there's nothing but the best intentions behind this playtest – to improve the design and player experience. However, if WotC have a marketing objective of, say, getting players to use the feat system more (based on their internal data showing that most players aren't using feats), then steering the conversation by selectively presenting survey questions so as not to undermine WotC's premise (<em>you want more feats</em>) is an effective way to do that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quickleaf, post: 8843882, member: 20323"] Well, that's not what I heard. Starting at 3:00 (verbatim, [B]emphasis mine[/B]) [I]"Some groups prefer not to use feats, which is one of the reasons why we're very carefully threading this needle of: Alright, [B]you get this free one[/B]. So we're not going to require you to engage with the feat system [B]repeatedly[/B] unless you really want to. But we also want to give you that [B]taste[/B], so that you can then make an informed decision about whether you later engage with feats."[/I] In the recent [URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kLAwL9yAtA']video[/URL], Jeremy Crawford describes the "background feat at 1st level" being wildly popular in their survey and that it scored the highest (almost 90% satisfaction) of their first One D&D Unearthed Arcana playtest survey. (As I note below, this may be flawed) He explains that anything scoring this high is very likely to see further development in the actual game. It's hard to not view this in light of something Jeremy said back in 2018: that a majority of D&D players don't use feats. [MEDIA=twitter]969020122177331200[/MEDIA] As [USER=11365]@Alphastream[/USER] said very well, this may be a flawed premise because there was no question asking "do you want bonus feats at 1st level?" (besides writing in your own comment in the text field at the end, which I did). There's a trend with these surveys to narrow the field of questioning to rating very specific features/feats/spells/races without asking the bigger question: do we even want this? So, that "~90% satisfaction with background feats at 1st level" [I]might [/I]be true – there certainly are a lot more players who are younger than me getting into D&D, and maybe they really connect with the power fantasy implied by a bonus background feat – but until they actually ask that question, we don't really know. Honestly, I wish I'd been saving these surveys to look back at, but I just haven't had the wherewithal. I want to believe that there's nothing but the best intentions behind this playtest – to improve the design and player experience. However, if WotC have a marketing objective of, say, getting players to use the feat system more (based on their internal data showing that most players aren't using feats), then steering the conversation by selectively presenting survey questions so as not to undermine WotC's premise ([I]you want more feats[/I]) is an effective way to do that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Feats still optional in 1D&D: and other notes from the survey results
Top