Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8844479" data-attributes="member: 6790260">I mean, so am I. I think feats shouldn't be optional at all, that players should be free to choose them at any ASI level (and, indeed, that they should get more opportunities to do so.) Feats are one of the few parts of 5e design I'm generally cool with, despite some of the balance wrinkles. The usual suspects are already known, though Elven Accuracy takes the cake for being stupidly broken, on top of also being a &quot;half feat&quot; when it absolutely should not have been one.It's just really confusing to see the claim that &quot;no guys they're totally still optional!&quot; when...they aren't. All first-level characters will have a feat now. This is a clear change. I think it's, overall, a good change. Trying to pretend it isn't a change is really, really weird, and makes me ponder questions I really would rather not ponder.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 8844479, member: 6790260"] I mean, so am I. I think feats shouldn't be optional at all, that players should be free to choose them at any ASI level (and, indeed, that they should get more opportunities to do so.) Feats are one of the few parts of 5e design I'm generally cool with, despite some of the balance wrinkles. The usual suspects are already known, though Elven Accuracy takes the cake for being [I]stupidly broken[/I], on top of also being a "half feat" when it absolutely should not have been one. It's just really confusing to see the claim that "no guys they're totally still optional!" when...they aren't. All first-level characters [I]will[/I] have a feat now. This is a clear change. I think it's, overall, a [I]good[/I] change. Trying to pretend it [I]isn't[/I] a change is really, [I]really[/I] weird, and makes me ponder questions I really would rather not ponder. [/QUOTE]

Verification