Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Feats with negative requirements
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RigaMortus" data-source="post: 906723" data-attributes="member: 1077"><p>I just heard about a feat (in a 3rd party book; I think it was Ultimate Feat Book) called "Grotesque". Requirement is that you have to have an 8 Charisma or lower to take the feat. Bascially what it does is let you use your Strength bonus on Intimidate checks AND if you win the Intimidate check by 10 or more, your target is shaken as long as they are within your presense. And if you win by 20 or more, they cower. I think it also makes Intimidate a Class skill for you too, but I'm not sure on that one.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, this got me thinking. Why not add some feats that take advantage of lower stats? In 2nd edition, the person who rolled highest for attributes was reward, while the people that rolled mediocre attributes (10 to 14) did not. This was curbed to some extent in 3E. But if a player with a low attribute could take advantage of it somehow (like through a feat) it might add some more depth to the character.</p><p></p><p>I do not think this would be too overpowering because that low stat will hurt the character in all other aspects (lowers skill checks, could lower saves, could lower AC or to hit bonus, etc.). Also, most people will still concentrate on improving their strengths anyway (I have a high Dex, so let me take feats that take advantage of my high Dex). This just gives another option to a player for character custimization (I want to be an ugly Half-Orc that scares people when they look at him, but also Intimidates real well on account of his uglyness).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RigaMortus, post: 906723, member: 1077"] I just heard about a feat (in a 3rd party book; I think it was Ultimate Feat Book) called "Grotesque". Requirement is that you have to have an 8 Charisma or lower to take the feat. Bascially what it does is let you use your Strength bonus on Intimidate checks AND if you win the Intimidate check by 10 or more, your target is shaken as long as they are within your presense. And if you win by 20 or more, they cower. I think it also makes Intimidate a Class skill for you too, but I'm not sure on that one. Anyway, this got me thinking. Why not add some feats that take advantage of lower stats? In 2nd edition, the person who rolled highest for attributes was reward, while the people that rolled mediocre attributes (10 to 14) did not. This was curbed to some extent in 3E. But if a player with a low attribute could take advantage of it somehow (like through a feat) it might add some more depth to the character. I do not think this would be too overpowering because that low stat will hurt the character in all other aspects (lowers skill checks, could lower saves, could lower AC or to hit bonus, etc.). Also, most people will still concentrate on improving their strengths anyway (I have a high Dex, so let me take feats that take advantage of my high Dex). This just gives another option to a player for character custimization (I want to be an ugly Half-Orc that scares people when they look at him, but also Intimidates real well on account of his uglyness). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Feats with negative requirements
Top