Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 3892710" data-attributes="member: 10177">Oh, I will. I have the "Builder" books, and the Book of Names, and will eventually get Living Fantasy and the book for thieves. I believe I'll have all the books at that point.I am also looking forward to the newest version of LA. I finally got around to creating a "Noble Human" and I am laughing at finding the equipment being the most difficult part of the rules to understand. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> I love how you have "Weapons" build with each other, as is illustrated by taking Weapons at 100% of Health and then Archery at 10%. Very solid idea. I also like how Chivalry and even physical can add even more to those skills. A definite feel of "building" your character from the ground up.About the only thing I don't like is having to have Chivalry ranked as your first skill to be part of the Noble order. I can see it for non humans and their required racial picks interfering with it, but humans pick their 4 at the same time, so I don't see why having Chivalry ranked second to weapons would preclude joining the order. I would think all that should matter is what rank you have IN Chivalry for purposes of determining placement within the order. Like my Nobles Chivalry maybe second ranked as a skill, but his Chivalry score places him in the 8th rank of the order, and only 4 points short of 7th rank.Fortunately Wulfgarn and I see eye to eye on that particular issue and a house rule addresses it. However, do you still think Chivalry should be ranked first, even for humans? Or have you changed your mind on this particular point after 10 or so years? If you still think it should be ranked first please share you rationale for it. I have changed my mind about many a rule over the years when I finally understood the rationale behind it.I also like how you have the amount of equipment a character has determined. You, or whomever posted it, weren't kidding when it was said a Knight could have so much equipment they could spare enough to equip half a party with no detriment to themselves.An excellent way of having nobility mean something but in a way that doesn't ruin the game.Definitely a lot to like about LA, and the more I read and reread the more I find to like.</blockquote>

Verification