Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Feeling short changed by 4th Ed.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 4332796" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>No.</p><p></p><p>Quite frequently, marketers keep their attention focused on how to sell a product that is already completed by the experts who are making said product -- they don't tell you what you should make, they focus on selling whatever it is you DO make. Arguably, its when the marketing department gets too involved that the issue of artistic integrity (and, related, authenticity and quality) comes up: when a TV show adds an ancillary "adorable child" character in the 5th season to boost ratings is one example that often goes awry.</p><p></p><p>Of course, it can also go well, giving the creative minds more fuel for the fire. If we're gonna use the "extra character" analogy, I don't think anyone would argue that, say, South Park has suffered from the introduction of Timmy or Jimmy or Butters. </p><p></p><p>It's not really a good or bad decision, right out of the gate, but it is a decision that carries certain baggage with it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you have to make it sexier than it was, then it obviously wasn't sexy enough for you.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>For one, it gives you an interesting and conflicted back-story, being halfway into the civilized world and halfway out of it (kind of like the original tiefling flavor did for them). But 4e absolutely posits that sexiness is not in that kind of back story, or, at least, not ENOUGH in it to warrant how sexy the dragonborn are.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm pretty sure that if the WotC folks wanted to make the sorcerer distinct, they could have and would have. They didn't really want to (yet), though. They wanted to give you sexy warlords and warlocks instead. These have the further benefit of being new hotness, breaking with the older edition, and further increasing how D&D can stand out in the fantasy melieu (whereas a "variant wizard" wasn't really one of those ways). </p><p></p><p>They just don't really care if you can't convert your sorcerer character right away, because the new hotness is more important to the strategy of the brand.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 4332796, member: 2067"] No. Quite frequently, marketers keep their attention focused on how to sell a product that is already completed by the experts who are making said product -- they don't tell you what you should make, they focus on selling whatever it is you DO make. Arguably, its when the marketing department gets too involved that the issue of artistic integrity (and, related, authenticity and quality) comes up: when a TV show adds an ancillary "adorable child" character in the 5th season to boost ratings is one example that often goes awry. Of course, it can also go well, giving the creative minds more fuel for the fire. If we're gonna use the "extra character" analogy, I don't think anyone would argue that, say, South Park has suffered from the introduction of Timmy or Jimmy or Butters. It's not really a good or bad decision, right out of the gate, but it is a decision that carries certain baggage with it. If you have to make it sexier than it was, then it obviously wasn't sexy enough for you. For one, it gives you an interesting and conflicted back-story, being halfway into the civilized world and halfway out of it (kind of like the original tiefling flavor did for them). But 4e absolutely posits that sexiness is not in that kind of back story, or, at least, not ENOUGH in it to warrant how sexy the dragonborn are. I'm pretty sure that if the WotC folks wanted to make the sorcerer distinct, they could have and would have. They didn't really want to (yet), though. They wanted to give you sexy warlords and warlocks instead. These have the further benefit of being new hotness, breaking with the older edition, and further increasing how D&D can stand out in the fantasy melieu (whereas a "variant wizard" wasn't really one of those ways). They just don't really care if you can't convert your sorcerer character right away, because the new hotness is more important to the strategy of the brand. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Feeling short changed by 4th Ed.
Top