Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
feelings and thoughts on Psionics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DaemonHunter" data-source="post: 5192448" data-attributes="member: 90373"><p>Its the same thing proof or not he is entitled to his opinion right or wrong. I dont want to get into this more as it will start me on a rant about all the other so called legal/canon builds I have seen on these forums that are anything but legal.</p><p></p><p>As for the gap, hell its a good start using a base line that already exists and better than just making it up as you go. I never said the classes were balanced but then I dont base my PC's on which is most over powered (which if you knew me is a miracle LOL) I build characters I want to play if that means a monk I play a monk if its a druid I play a druid. I very rarely play a caster as I get bored too easily with them, unless I find a theme I like. The last being a force mage with force missile mage and argent savant was a nice idea but did start to get alittle overpowered in the end.</p><p></p><p>I build all PC/NPC's the same I have an idea of what I want to be able to do and build from there not look at what I can break, thats too easy and has lead me to leave plenty of game systems in the past.</p><p></p><p>The system is un-balanced and theres nothing to do about it but I find it works just fine for me, it does mean that everything I design fits into this imperfect frame work just fine and not working off the most broken to make it worse. After all it has a high and a low point built in <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> As long as it fits between these points its fine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DaemonHunter, post: 5192448, member: 90373"] Its the same thing proof or not he is entitled to his opinion right or wrong. I dont want to get into this more as it will start me on a rant about all the other so called legal/canon builds I have seen on these forums that are anything but legal. As for the gap, hell its a good start using a base line that already exists and better than just making it up as you go. I never said the classes were balanced but then I dont base my PC's on which is most over powered (which if you knew me is a miracle LOL) I build characters I want to play if that means a monk I play a monk if its a druid I play a druid. I very rarely play a caster as I get bored too easily with them, unless I find a theme I like. The last being a force mage with force missile mage and argent savant was a nice idea but did start to get alittle overpowered in the end. I build all PC/NPC's the same I have an idea of what I want to be able to do and build from there not look at what I can break, thats too easy and has lead me to leave plenty of game systems in the past. The system is un-balanced and theres nothing to do about it but I find it works just fine for me, it does mean that everything I design fits into this imperfect frame work just fine and not working off the most broken to make it worse. After all it has a high and a low point built in :) As long as it fits between these points its fine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
feelings and thoughts on Psionics
Top
