Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Fellowship of the Witching Hour OOC Thread (Full)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dlsharrock" data-source="post: 4268343" data-attributes="member: 55833"><p>I don't know what a 'pseudo in character aside' is. </p><p></p><p>To my mind it was an OOC comment directed at Lucean. In-character comments should be made in-character. Out of character comments should be made out of character. The guidelines clearly state you should mark OOC comments OOC so there's no misunderstanding. There is no PICA option.</p><p></p><p>I can't find any evidence of an OOC question from Lucean concerning how Cara found out about the group. None of which explains why you attempted to discern IC details using a critical comment later in the game, so my opinion remains unchanged.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: I forgot to comment on this part, sorry:</p><p></p><p>Actually I disagree. I think it would have been most acceptable. Far more appropriate than posting an OOC comment to the player. But again, this merely suggests to me that you're having difficulting defining the difference between what the character thinks and what the player thinks. The two are mutually exclusive, which is the whole point of IC and OOC.</p><p></p><p>I've politely advised Lucean against commenting, precisely because of his proximity to the issue. If you'd like to rephrase your question to him in the IC thread when/if we've resolved this, Dire Lemming, I encourage you to do so in a way that makes your intentions clearer so that you have a better understanding of what Adam knows about Philip's personality. </p><p></p><p>The fact remains, *I*, as moderator of this game, have taken issue with the comments, not Lucean. Effectively, it has nothing to do with him and he shouldn't feel obliged in any way shape or form to get involved if he doesn't want to.</p><p></p><p>Crucially: we would be having the same discussion had you directed your comment at greenstar or Kookalouris. Indeed I'd have taken issue with any player who made the comment in question. </p><p></p><p>That said, if Lucean feels strongly about commenting, I certainly won't censor him from doing so, particularly as Kookalouris and greenstar have both commented. Though nothing Lucean says will change my standpoint, especially considering I have already sought eleven objective opinions.</p><p></p><p>More relevantly, you haven't explained how I have misinterpreted your comments, nor (more importantly AFAIC) agreed to either of my requests. My assumption can only be that you have no interest in a resolution.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dlsharrock, post: 4268343, member: 55833"] I don't know what a 'pseudo in character aside' is. To my mind it was an OOC comment directed at Lucean. In-character comments should be made in-character. Out of character comments should be made out of character. The guidelines clearly state you should mark OOC comments OOC so there's no misunderstanding. There is no PICA option. I can't find any evidence of an OOC question from Lucean concerning how Cara found out about the group. None of which explains why you attempted to discern IC details using a critical comment later in the game, so my opinion remains unchanged. EDIT: I forgot to comment on this part, sorry: Actually I disagree. I think it would have been most acceptable. Far more appropriate than posting an OOC comment to the player. But again, this merely suggests to me that you're having difficulting defining the difference between what the character thinks and what the player thinks. The two are mutually exclusive, which is the whole point of IC and OOC. I've politely advised Lucean against commenting, precisely because of his proximity to the issue. If you'd like to rephrase your question to him in the IC thread when/if we've resolved this, Dire Lemming, I encourage you to do so in a way that makes your intentions clearer so that you have a better understanding of what Adam knows about Philip's personality. The fact remains, *I*, as moderator of this game, have taken issue with the comments, not Lucean. Effectively, it has nothing to do with him and he shouldn't feel obliged in any way shape or form to get involved if he doesn't want to. Crucially: we would be having the same discussion had you directed your comment at greenstar or Kookalouris. Indeed I'd have taken issue with any player who made the comment in question. That said, if Lucean feels strongly about commenting, I certainly won't censor him from doing so, particularly as Kookalouris and greenstar have both commented. Though nothing Lucean says will change my standpoint, especially considering I have already sought eleven objective opinions. More relevantly, you haven't explained how I have misinterpreted your comments, nor (more importantly AFAIC) agreed to either of my requests. My assumption can only be that you have no interest in a resolution. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Fellowship of the Witching Hour OOC Thread (Full)
Top