Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Few ideas for rules.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cbbakke" data-source="post: 4664535" data-attributes="member: 72549"><p>Overall I like the dnd system but would like to see a little more meat added to it for realism and seperation of classes so your guy feels more unique.</p><p> </p><p>Ideas</p><p> </p><p>1. At level 2 and every level there after you get 1 skill point to put in any skill the DM approves that you have used during that level. So at 10th level you would have 9 extra skill points. A sub rule to this would be these bonus points cant be more then 1/2 your level in one skill. So at 11th level you couldnt have more then 5 bonus points in any one skill. Right now you could have two people with the same stat and trained in a skill. At 11th level one is very focussed on that skill (religion for example) while the other merely dables in it. Game wise they still both have the same chance of success. </p><p> </p><p>2. For every death check you have (meaning failed death check), u have a minus that number to all rolls and defenses until you have an extended rest. </p><p>Example: Bob the Rogue is knocked to -3 and the first two rounds he is down he fails his death check. The following round the healer gets him back up. Until he gets an extended rest Bob is at -2 to every roll. Kind of the effect of being that close to death.</p><p> </p><p>3. When you are brought back from being unconcious you are considered dazed. Save ends. I hate when a guy gets knocked below zero, gets a heal, on his turn stands up, does an encounter power attack, minor heal, action point daily power. The negatives to rolls from rule 2 would apply to this also of course.</p><p> </p><p>I also think there is some decent roleplay quality to the hero just getting to his feet and staggering around trying to fight as he continues to be dazed. </p><p> </p><p>4. When doing a range attack on a person. Your allies provide cover for the target if they are adjacent to the target. If enemies block the path completely and are adjacent to the target they provide superior cover.</p><p> </p><p>Why the change</p><p>a. Realism it is silly how it is now. </p><p> </p><p>b. tactically is makes range even more over powered and on the other side does not allow ways for people to protect their allies. </p><p> </p><p>Example. The great necro lich the party has finally found in the deep crypts. The lich has 20 minions trying to protect him from the oncoming attack. The players need hold the line and let their range beat on the lich at a mere -2 to hit. </p><p> </p><p>Tactically if the lich wants to keep the front flank completely blocked by adjacent enemies, I think he should have more of a benefit. This goes for the players protecting their healer. A smart group of band guys would just range fire the healer down first and the tank can do really nothing about it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cbbakke, post: 4664535, member: 72549"] Overall I like the dnd system but would like to see a little more meat added to it for realism and seperation of classes so your guy feels more unique. Ideas 1. At level 2 and every level there after you get 1 skill point to put in any skill the DM approves that you have used during that level. So at 10th level you would have 9 extra skill points. A sub rule to this would be these bonus points cant be more then 1/2 your level in one skill. So at 11th level you couldnt have more then 5 bonus points in any one skill. Right now you could have two people with the same stat and trained in a skill. At 11th level one is very focussed on that skill (religion for example) while the other merely dables in it. Game wise they still both have the same chance of success. 2. For every death check you have (meaning failed death check), u have a minus that number to all rolls and defenses until you have an extended rest. Example: Bob the Rogue is knocked to -3 and the first two rounds he is down he fails his death check. The following round the healer gets him back up. Until he gets an extended rest Bob is at -2 to every roll. Kind of the effect of being that close to death. 3. When you are brought back from being unconcious you are considered dazed. Save ends. I hate when a guy gets knocked below zero, gets a heal, on his turn stands up, does an encounter power attack, minor heal, action point daily power. The negatives to rolls from rule 2 would apply to this also of course. I also think there is some decent roleplay quality to the hero just getting to his feet and staggering around trying to fight as he continues to be dazed. 4. When doing a range attack on a person. Your allies provide cover for the target if they are adjacent to the target. If enemies block the path completely and are adjacent to the target they provide superior cover. Why the change a. Realism it is silly how it is now. b. tactically is makes range even more over powered and on the other side does not allow ways for people to protect their allies. Example. The great necro lich the party has finally found in the deep crypts. The lich has 20 minions trying to protect him from the oncoming attack. The players need hold the line and let their range beat on the lich at a mere -2 to hit. Tactically if the lich wants to keep the front flank completely blocked by adjacent enemies, I think he should have more of a benefit. This goes for the players protecting their healer. A smart group of band guys would just range fire the healer down first and the tank can do really nothing about it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Few ideas for rules.
Top