Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Shemeska" data-source="post: 2646613" data-attributes="member: 11697">I like the Demonicon, I think it's one of the best parts of Dragon magazine in years. Hell it's been fraggin awesome so far. I hope to see more and I'd love to contribute. I just don't feel the stats have been handled properly, but it's not the fault of the writers at all since they simply have to toe the line that 3e has taken with them already in previous publications such as the BoVD. If I got a chance to write an article in the series that's the same standard I'd have to use, regardless of if I agree with it or not. Jacobs and company can't be faulted in the least for having to go with the 3e convention, I'm just saying I'd have preferred a lack of stats in the first place in this edition.And how do you know for certain that it's only a "very-vocal minority" that feels that way about the stats? Because they don't agree with you? It's probably about equal between the three various camps who weigh in on the topic. I prefer unstatted demon lords, some people would prefer them statted up with full ELH rules and able to take down 3e type deities, while others want just big monsters in a CR 20ish range.</blockquote>