Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pants" data-source="post: 2658070" data-attributes="member: 8849">I like this one.There was an article in Dragon back right after 3.0 came out written from the POV of a Sage of Fiends. Enchiridion of the Fiend Sage I think it was called. It was the issue that had the Cataboligne Demon (which, IMO, should be included in the book <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ) and Gingwatzim statted up. Very well done actually.The issue number escapes me at the moment, but I could dredge through my magazine piles if anyone is interested.These would be great as little optional sidebars.  Present the way that the Core D&D cosmology presents fiends with these little optional tidbits here and there. That would be cool.Other Suggestions:1) I said this before in the other thread, but if FCI includes any Demonic Lord info, I think it'd be best presented as deity writeups (ala Complete Divine or what Orcus got in Libris Mortis). Short flavor with info on Domains and maybe some sample cultists, sample cults, that sort of thing.2) Personally, I think it would be cool to more thoroughly explore the 'Lichfiend.' It was presented as an option in Libris Mortis, but I think it might be kind of neat to flesh it out a bit.3) I'd like to see the book reprint a lot of the old 3.0 demons and give them their 3.5 power boost.</blockquote>

Verification