Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Fiendish Codex III: Yugoloths poll
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Desdichado" data-source="post: 3290219" data-attributes="member: 2205"><p>I guess I'm guilty of over-rating it. Along with <em>The Monsternomicon</em> it's my favorite d20 book. But I think you make some good points. Let's see:</p><p></p><p>I've thought about doing that exact same thing before. The thaumaturge isn't a complete waste of space, but it's not something I'd ever use. I can appreciate the flavor of it, but I agree that other solutions would be more up my alley, including the same ones you offer, actually.</p><p></p><p>Well, there's two competing goals here, and one makes the other impossible to achieve. When the fiends got boosted in the change from 3e to 3.5, the logical thing to do, given fiendish hierarchies, would have been to boost the Dukes of Hell and whatnot. <strong>However</strong>, doing so makes the statblocks considerably less useful to DMs because the CRs are now out of range of most campaign arcs, whereas keeping them at about the same power level means that they're usable. So, while I see you're point, I think Green Ronin was kinda stuck between two undesirable alternatives and picked the best one. There's always advancement rules for monster entries to get the fiendish "lords" up to where they need to be, after all.</p><p></p><p>True. I like the Demonomicon practice of offering up even more advanced versions when they do the demon lords myself. Dagon, for example, is what--CR 21 or so in FC:I (going by memory; could be off by a few) while his recent dragon article pumped him up to CR 33. I think that makes a lot more sense for a demon lord, personally.</p><p></p><p>Really? I think it's got a lot of things in it that are more "vile" than the BOVD. Not that the <em>Book of Fiends</em> is just unremitting nastiness or anything, but I didn't really see it as silly-stupid evil, and I thought the "vile" angle was definately a cut above <em>Vile Darkness</em>.</p><p></p><p>To add one critique of my own--I know Loeb and Schwalb put a fair bit of effort in the daemons section to offer play hooks for each creature type; a reason to have it involved in the campaign, so to speak. However, I think the play hooks are pretty repetitive. They almost all boil down to either a PC or an NPC commit some sin and a daemon comes a-calling in payment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Desdichado, post: 3290219, member: 2205"] I guess I'm guilty of over-rating it. Along with [i]The Monsternomicon[/i] it's my favorite d20 book. But I think you make some good points. Let's see: I've thought about doing that exact same thing before. The thaumaturge isn't a complete waste of space, but it's not something I'd ever use. I can appreciate the flavor of it, but I agree that other solutions would be more up my alley, including the same ones you offer, actually. Well, there's two competing goals here, and one makes the other impossible to achieve. When the fiends got boosted in the change from 3e to 3.5, the logical thing to do, given fiendish hierarchies, would have been to boost the Dukes of Hell and whatnot. [b]However[/b], doing so makes the statblocks considerably less useful to DMs because the CRs are now out of range of most campaign arcs, whereas keeping them at about the same power level means that they're usable. So, while I see you're point, I think Green Ronin was kinda stuck between two undesirable alternatives and picked the best one. There's always advancement rules for monster entries to get the fiendish "lords" up to where they need to be, after all. True. I like the Demonomicon practice of offering up even more advanced versions when they do the demon lords myself. Dagon, for example, is what--CR 21 or so in FC:I (going by memory; could be off by a few) while his recent dragon article pumped him up to CR 33. I think that makes a lot more sense for a demon lord, personally. Really? I think it's got a lot of things in it that are more "vile" than the BOVD. Not that the [i]Book of Fiends[/i] is just unremitting nastiness or anything, but I didn't really see it as silly-stupid evil, and I thought the "vile" angle was definately a cut above [i]Vile Darkness[/i]. To add one critique of my own--I know Loeb and Schwalb put a fair bit of effort in the daemons section to offer play hooks for each creature type; a reason to have it involved in the campaign, so to speak. However, I think the play hooks are pretty repetitive. They almost all boil down to either a PC or an NPC commit some sin and a daemon comes a-calling in payment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Fiendish Codex III: Yugoloths poll
Top