Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Fifa World Cup 2010
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morrus" data-source="post: 5217213" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>With all due respect, the World Cup has been the biggest sporting event on the planet for decades <em>despite </em>the US's disinterest. The amount of money a team like ManU generates is stupendous. Having the yanks interested would be a bonus, but it really is not necessary. </p><p> </p><p>The principle of "<em>the game does not stop</em>" makes the game play like it does. I agree that pausing it and reviewing decisions would result in a higher accuracy rate; but it would change the game. And, your own country aside, it cannot be denied that the formula works on a massive scale, and has done for decades. Viewing figures are in the billions, and the revenue is mind-bogglingly huge. A few million more viewers from America really isn't gonna make any difference.</p><p> </p><p>As for whether the call was right or not - it <em>was</em> right. Foul, whistle. And the ref is <em>not</em> required to stop and explain it. The game keeps going. The players don't get to stop playing. Sprinting for 90 minutes is an expensive skill to train them in! But it was a perfect storm of the right call being <em>really</em> unfortunate for the US team given the timing. It is unfortunate, and the US did lose out. ANd yes, that sucks, and I feel for you. Having been on the other end of similar situations, don't think I don't understand where you're coming from.</p><p> </p><p>But "change the way the game works" so the US might become interested? That's not gonna happen. People have been arguing for and against extra tech and so forth for decades, and this is just another minor data point. There are strong arguments both for and against it, and we're not going to come up with any new argument here on EN World which hasn't already been discussed endlessly for the last 50 years.</p><p> </p><p>"Americans finding a new way to hate soccer" is <em>not</em> "enormously damaging to the sport". I understand the temptation to wish it were so, but the truth is it just frankly ain't. If no American ever watched a football game again for the rest of eternity, football would still thrive immensely - as it always has done.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morrus, post: 5217213, member: 1"] With all due respect, the World Cup has been the biggest sporting event on the planet for decades [I]despite [/I]the US's disinterest. The amount of money a team like ManU generates is stupendous. Having the yanks interested would be a bonus, but it really is not necessary. The principle of "[I]the game does not stop[/I]" makes the game play like it does. I agree that pausing it and reviewing decisions would result in a higher accuracy rate; but it would change the game. And, your own country aside, it cannot be denied that the formula works on a massive scale, and has done for decades. Viewing figures are in the billions, and the revenue is mind-bogglingly huge. A few million more viewers from America really isn't gonna make any difference. As for whether the call was right or not - it [I]was[/I] right. Foul, whistle. And the ref is [I]not[/I] required to stop and explain it. The game keeps going. The players don't get to stop playing. Sprinting for 90 minutes is an expensive skill to train them in! But it was a perfect storm of the right call being [I]really[/I] unfortunate for the US team given the timing. It is unfortunate, and the US did lose out. ANd yes, that sucks, and I feel for you. Having been on the other end of similar situations, don't think I don't understand where you're coming from. But "change the way the game works" so the US might become interested? That's not gonna happen. People have been arguing for and against extra tech and so forth for decades, and this is just another minor data point. There are strong arguments both for and against it, and we're not going to come up with any new argument here on EN World which hasn't already been discussed endlessly for the last 50 years. "Americans finding a new way to hate soccer" is [I]not[/I] "enormously damaging to the sport". I understand the temptation to wish it were so, but the truth is it just frankly ain't. If no American ever watched a football game again for the rest of eternity, football would still thrive immensely - as it always has done. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Fifa World Cup 2010
Top