Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Connorsrpg" data-source="post: 6743969" data-attributes="member: 19265">[MENTION=6801700]UnadvisedGoose445[/MENTION]. And opinions are good, that is why I am here <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Thanks for taking a look. I am hearing you <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />, but how do I explain to my group I changed all this on advice from someone called UnadvisedGoose445? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Even UnadvisedGoose1 would be a hard sell.I see what you are getting at here. I have an idea, but first. To the defense of the current Duelist, the current maneuvers need something constant to back them up. (I did not think imp crit with weapons dealing up to 1d8 max damage (1 weapon). I am torn on this one. Others?The extra fighting style. Well, yes, that does seem too much with a maneuver (though, again, the actual maneuvers merely add another option, not something constant). Again I am torn, as there are now several Fighting Styles that really suit the duelist.Would it look as bad if select fighting styles were amongst the Maneuver choices? (Probably yes). So, should I get rid of the 3 levels of maneuvers, go for 2 (Basic and Advanced) and then just have a 2nd fighting style here? Or lose 2nd fighting style altogether?Back to imp crit. What if it was an actual maneuver? ie, it takes up a choice. You could further limit it by either paying a panache point (but that sounds odd, as it is after the roll), or, my preferred option, only operates whilst you have at least 1 panache point in your pool.Fair compromises? What are your specific thoughts here.And once again, thanks for your critical (no pun intended) eye. I want to make these archetypes the best they can be - that is why I placed them on ENWorld. There is always someone here that sees something I/my group doesn't. Cheers.</blockquote>

Verification