Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Connorsrpg" data-source="post: 6746852" data-attributes="member: 19265">[MENTION=6801700]UnadvisedGoose445[/MENTION]. Point taken, but I don't see this Duelist as best of both. You really need to have a close read of the actual Techniques to see that. I can see toning back (as stated above), but don't the actual techniques make this guy a little different conceptually? These guys are best with light blades. Oh, and I DO have an Unarmored Defense option that fighters can take.It is on our Fighter Page, if you are interested: <a href="http://connorscampaigns.wikidot.com/5e-fighter" target="_blank">http://connorscampaigns.wikidot.com/5e-fighter</a>.And yeah, you 'could' take the extra techniques as maneuvers for a battlemaster, but I wanted to design this around a concept AND try new (simpler, no dice) mechanics. But I certainly don't want to start those discussions again. (See links in OP for those discussions that have already taken place).We like the concept/idea. Just wondering whether you had any feedback on the specific changes I mentioned above.</blockquote>