Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Connorsrpg" data-source="post: 6772555" data-attributes="member: 19265">I really like the idea of this archetype. I especially like the specialised combos that depend upon weapon used, but this could be a nightmare recording on your PC Sheet.The archetype does seem too powerful; especially the features that override the fighter class or normal 5E standards. I am not sure I would allow double proficiency bonus to attack rolls and allowing you to use DEX or STR no matter the weapon seems odd to me. DEX with a maul? This seems to be very advantageous to a fighter that focuses on either DEX or STR. In fact, why bother with STR at all?Finesse is a pretty exclusive quality - not even monk unarmed attacks have it for a reason.Re the combo: you might want to reword the parameters to read "weapon attacks". ie if I miss with a cantrip is it off? If I hit with a cantrip, that is okay, b/c it is an 'attack'. I am sure you mean 'weapon attack', but you want to make that explicit.I like the idea. Some things are just rubbing me the wrong way, but I really like your thinking for this guy. It really does focus on the weapon used <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> (BTW - have you seen the EN5ider article that outlines weapon qualities? This could save some time. ie you could just apply some of these qualities as part of the combo).</blockquote>

Verification