Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fighter design goals . L&L April 30th
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GM Dave" data-source="post: 5897549" data-attributes="member: 6687992"><p>I was thinking on the Barbarian Class the other day.</p><p></p><p>1> If the primitive schtick is going to become a background then that takes a chunk out of the Barbarian class.</p><p></p><p>2> If the Fighter is the Best Fighter with all weapons then the Barbarian can not be a specialist type of fighter.</p><p></p><p>3> If the Fighter is the Toughest then the Barbarian can not be the juggernaut that shrugs off wounds that would leave other opponents dead (personally, I think the fighter should leave this schtick for the Barbarian as it has always been the Barbarian's thing to have d12 hit points and gain things like Damage Reduction because they gave up heavy armour).</p><p></p><p>4> This leaves the Barbarian with Raging and Charging. This is more of a Berserker than a Barbarian (as other posters have noted and does harken back to the roots of DnD). Charging is a loaded gift to the Barbarian as it takes a possible schtick away from the Paladin to represent how they are good on mounts and off of mounts at the fore front of a battle.</p><p></p><p>Still, Raging while possible to define a class (4e built many attacks with potential follow up attacks triggered by things like criticals and a spike damage mechanic when the Barbarian was 'in a rage'). It seems to be a bit of a thin thing.</p><p></p><p>5> This led me to think back to 3e and the Power Attack feat. As a feat it was too dominant. It was almost a requirement in any melee feat progression to bump up your damage to keep pace with casters (there are some melee progression feat progressions without it but those are based on 'tricks' and specific sets of feat choices). 4e kept the term Power Attack but it was radically reduced in value.</p><p></p><p>I think this trade of damage for chance to hit would fit best the Barbarian/Berserker mindset. It gives them a second schtik to build the class on as a constant bonus that they can choose to employ.</p><p></p><p>The fighter is the best in melee but the Barbarian/Berserker is the crazy warrior that is 'all in' with attacks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GM Dave, post: 5897549, member: 6687992"] I was thinking on the Barbarian Class the other day. 1> If the primitive schtick is going to become a background then that takes a chunk out of the Barbarian class. 2> If the Fighter is the Best Fighter with all weapons then the Barbarian can not be a specialist type of fighter. 3> If the Fighter is the Toughest then the Barbarian can not be the juggernaut that shrugs off wounds that would leave other opponents dead (personally, I think the fighter should leave this schtick for the Barbarian as it has always been the Barbarian's thing to have d12 hit points and gain things like Damage Reduction because they gave up heavy armour). 4> This leaves the Barbarian with Raging and Charging. This is more of a Berserker than a Barbarian (as other posters have noted and does harken back to the roots of DnD). Charging is a loaded gift to the Barbarian as it takes a possible schtick away from the Paladin to represent how they are good on mounts and off of mounts at the fore front of a battle. Still, Raging while possible to define a class (4e built many attacks with potential follow up attacks triggered by things like criticals and a spike damage mechanic when the Barbarian was 'in a rage'). It seems to be a bit of a thin thing. 5> This led me to think back to 3e and the Power Attack feat. As a feat it was too dominant. It was almost a requirement in any melee feat progression to bump up your damage to keep pace with casters (there are some melee progression feat progressions without it but those are based on 'tricks' and specific sets of feat choices). 4e kept the term Power Attack but it was radically reduced in value. I think this trade of damage for chance to hit would fit best the Barbarian/Berserker mindset. It gives them a second schtik to build the class on as a constant bonus that they can choose to employ. The fighter is the best in melee but the Barbarian/Berserker is the crazy warrior that is 'all in' with attacks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fighter design goals . L&L April 30th
Top