Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighter should be called Knight and Monk Should be called Fighter, change my mind
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Staffan" data-source="post: 9380018" data-attributes="member: 907"><p>This goes back to the old discussion: is this a variant on a particular archetype, or is it a full archetype with its own set of variants? If it's the former, a subclass can be sufficient, but if it's the latter you need a full class (this is basically the issue I have with 5e's psionic offerings so far).</p><p></p><p>What I mean is that yes, you can do "dude who fights unarmed" as a perfectly cromulent fighter subclass. But the fighter doesn't have room for all the various more-or-less supernaturally powered monk subclasses like the Way of Shadow ninja-style monk, the Way of the Elements bender-style monk, and stuff like that. If you want that kind of variety, you need a monk class for those to work off (though it might not be <strong>named</strong> monk – I believe Level Up calls their an Adept).</p><p></p><p></p><p>WoW taught me a thing about talent trees: you need to put strong/iconic abilities deep into the trees, or they become poachable. This means that it can take a long time for them to "come online".</p><p></p><p>The classic WoW example are Enhancement shamans, who traditionally dual-wield using elementally empowered weapons mixed with direct elemental attacks. Their most iconic ability is Stormstrike, which lets them hit really hard with both weapons as well as (IIRC) give them an attack speed buff. In classic WoW, this ability was deep into the Enhancement talent tree, so you needed to be like level 40 (out of max 60) to take it. Before you had it, you were basically relegated to autoattacks with an occasional Earth Shock or Flame Shock, which was a pretty dull way of leveling up. However, this ability needed to be this deep into the tree in order to be an Enhancement shaman thing instead of being something any Shaman could get.</p><p></p><p>But in a later revamp, they changed things so instead of picking talents á la carte from a talent tree, you just chose a subclass and got all of its iconic abilities right away. Some may have been delayed to later levels, but you didn't need to pick and choose to get the iconic abilities. You wanna be an enhancement shaman? Here's Stormstrike, right at level 10 when you get the subclass.</p><p></p><p>So talent trees generally aren't a good way to provide characters with iconic abilities. They work best for fine-tuning things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Staffan, post: 9380018, member: 907"] This goes back to the old discussion: is this a variant on a particular archetype, or is it a full archetype with its own set of variants? If it's the former, a subclass can be sufficient, but if it's the latter you need a full class (this is basically the issue I have with 5e's psionic offerings so far). What I mean is that yes, you can do "dude who fights unarmed" as a perfectly cromulent fighter subclass. But the fighter doesn't have room for all the various more-or-less supernaturally powered monk subclasses like the Way of Shadow ninja-style monk, the Way of the Elements bender-style monk, and stuff like that. If you want that kind of variety, you need a monk class for those to work off (though it might not be [B]named[/B] monk – I believe Level Up calls their an Adept). WoW taught me a thing about talent trees: you need to put strong/iconic abilities deep into the trees, or they become poachable. This means that it can take a long time for them to "come online". The classic WoW example are Enhancement shamans, who traditionally dual-wield using elementally empowered weapons mixed with direct elemental attacks. Their most iconic ability is Stormstrike, which lets them hit really hard with both weapons as well as (IIRC) give them an attack speed buff. In classic WoW, this ability was deep into the Enhancement talent tree, so you needed to be like level 40 (out of max 60) to take it. Before you had it, you were basically relegated to autoattacks with an occasional Earth Shock or Flame Shock, which was a pretty dull way of leveling up. However, this ability needed to be this deep into the tree in order to be an Enhancement shaman thing instead of being something any Shaman could get. But in a later revamp, they changed things so instead of picking talents á la carte from a talent tree, you just chose a subclass and got all of its iconic abilities right away. Some may have been delayed to later levels, but you didn't need to pick and choose to get the iconic abilities. You wanna be an enhancement shaman? Here's Stormstrike, right at level 10 when you get the subclass. So talent trees generally aren't a good way to provide characters with iconic abilities. They work best for fine-tuning things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighter should be called Knight and Monk Should be called Fighter, change my mind
Top