Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Not a Decepticon" data-source="post: 9380986" data-attributes="member: 7020527">There are few points that&nbsp; are being repeated so I will try to adress them together:<ol>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">Many medeival knights could not afford armor or horse and had to think of different means of fighting. There were also members of nobility and royalty, who carried knightly titles. Knights served varied roles depending on personal position or financial need, so&nbsp; I don't see why would naming Fighter Knight imply only one style of combat over others.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">I do question everyone saying that Knight denotes specific social class, whenever they feel that about subclasses already using this word, like Eldritch, Echo and Rune Knight.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">I'm actually of opinion that all the supernatural stuff Monk can currently do should be moved to Ranger and the Monk shoud, indeed, become the MMA and traditional martial arts class. There is enough styles for many subclasses (even boxing has 4 different styles - pressure fighter, out-boxer, brawler and boxer puncher)</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">The &quot;they should all be subclasses for a single Warrior class&quot; or &quot;we should ditch classes altogether&quot; would be a level of homebrew a bit beyond calling it 5e, or even d&amp;d for that matter.</li>
</ol></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Not a Decepticon, post: 9380986, member: 7020527"] There are few points that are being repeated so I will try to adress them together: [LIST=1] [*]Many medeival knights could not afford armor or horse and had to think of different means of fighting. There were also members of nobility and royalty, who carried knightly titles. Knights served varied roles depending on personal position or financial need, so I don't see why would naming Fighter Knight imply only one style of combat over others. [*]I do question everyone saying that Knight denotes specific social class, whenever they feel that about subclasses already using this word, like Eldritch, Echo and Rune Knight. [*]I'm actually of opinion that all the supernatural stuff Monk can currently do should be moved to Ranger and the Monk shoud, indeed, become the MMA and traditional martial arts class. There is enough styles for many subclasses (even boxing has 4 different styles - pressure fighter, out-boxer, brawler and boxer puncher) [*]The "they should all be subclasses for a single Warrior class" or "we should ditch classes altogether" would be a level of homebrew a bit beyond calling it 5e, or even d&d for that matter. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]

Verification