Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jlhorner1974" data-source="post: 1095958" data-attributes="member: 8628">You're right, I did miss how radical your opinion is.  I disagree with you, but I believe people are entitled to their own opinions.  I think it is good that you explore ideas beyond the norms.  To me, it's such a big difference from the D&D philosophy that I don't know how you can get the vision you want with a few feats and keep things balanced.  I prefer to stay reasonably close to the core rules, and what you propose really shakes things up quite a lot.  That doesn't mean it's bad, it just means it's different.  I think that to implement your vision properly and maintain balance between the classes would involve a sweeping rewrite of the class system.  I prefer a game heavy on role playing myself, but game balance ultimately comes down to combat ability.  One thing I think is that if you give damage dealing spell-like feats only to the fighter-type classes, it has a huge effect on game balance.  Taking away direct damage from the sorceror/wizard, is an even bigger change.  Not every wizard needs an Evocation-heavy spellbook, but no damage dealing spells at all?  If it works for you, so much the better.  I think a lot of people feel that wizards and sorcerors are a little more powerful than fighters at high levels.  Even the 3.5 revision agrees, and has toned down the arcane casters somewhat.  But this is a major difference from your ideas.Do whatever works for you and your players, but I doubt that you will find many supporters here.  I wish you luck.</blockquote>

Verification