Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighter Subclass: The Bravura! (INT-based, tactical, non-magical)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest 6801328" data-source="post: 7327129"><p>And let's talk about Int. I'm wary of making the class too MAD; after all they will still be attacking with their own weapon, so will want Str or Dex. I guess Monks and Paladins already have two roughly equivalent stats.</p><p></p><p>As I explained earlier, I now think it's problematic to make the number of reactions you get a function of INT, because combining that with a number that increases with level is inelegant. (I mean, it could be INT, then INT + 1, then INT + 2, but that just feels sloppy.)</p><p></p><p>I do like the idea that the plan-making ability at level 10 somehow uses Int. E.g., "Everybody in the party gets to add your Int bonus to one ability check that directly contributes to the stated goal".</p><p></p><p>And the ability to help with Wisdom saving throws could first require an Int check against 10 + spell level. That feels flavorful to me. I could see one other reaction either requiring an Int check or granting an Int bonus.</p><p></p><p>Is that enough to make Int desirable but not mandatory?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 6801328, post: 7327129"] And let's talk about Int. I'm wary of making the class too MAD; after all they will still be attacking with their own weapon, so will want Str or Dex. I guess Monks and Paladins already have two roughly equivalent stats. As I explained earlier, I now think it's problematic to make the number of reactions you get a function of INT, because combining that with a number that increases with level is inelegant. (I mean, it could be INT, then INT + 1, then INT + 2, but that just feels sloppy.) I do like the idea that the plan-making ability at level 10 somehow uses Int. E.g., "Everybody in the party gets to add your Int bonus to one ability check that directly contributes to the stated goal". And the ability to help with Wisdom saving throws could first require an Int check against 10 + spell level. That feels flavorful to me. I could see one other reaction either requiring an Int check or granting an Int bonus. Is that enough to make Int desirable but not mandatory? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighter Subclass: The Bravura! (INT-based, tactical, non-magical)
Top