Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighter Weapon Choice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="n00b f00" data-source="post: 6628734" data-attributes="member: 6795700"><p>To me a smallish difference isn't a big deal. One that we can see with charts, but that I don't think your average professional soldier would be absolutely certain with math in the setting. Like, they would for sure see the difference with a d12 versus a d4. But a d6 versus a d8? I think the average one point of damage that they'd see, if they saw a ton of fighting with those weapons, would be something they likely chalked up to small sample size, or they would confirmation basis. Or at least many would. I've seen people argue about guns, and calibers, and ranges forever. They've linked charts, dummy tests, stories, reports from battlefield medics. And they still don't agree. They can oftentimes not agree on which one is meaningfully more damaging to the health of a human body at all, or if being that much more damaging actually is meaningful in a fight.</p><p></p><p>To me that just makes it more obvious that that PCs couldn't honestly prove that one was worse than other when it was a minor discrepancy. Because in real life, with all the information we have. You still have gun nuts argue til they're purple in the face that no, their chosen gun is the d8 and the other one is the d6. I don't see why it'd be any different in DnD unless you wanted to metagame which is just fine. Or they did do the orc stabby test a few thousand times and found that yes, this weapon is marginally better.</p><p></p><p>To me as a player, I wouldn't really sweat it. Unless it was either a very large mechanical difference. Like a str barbarian using a single dagger, which would come across as inane in and out of universe, or we were just playing a campaign based around winning a series of narrative free combat encounters in a void. Which isn't an insult, it's a totally chill way to play the game, and the only one I'd feel raw over. Though honestly, if I felt like I really wanted my roman legionnaire to use a shortsword for flavor, I'd ask my GM if I could just reskin a rapier as a shortsword. That way we all win, and I can't make a reasonable argument for why a GM might turn down that request.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="n00b f00, post: 6628734, member: 6795700"] To me a smallish difference isn't a big deal. One that we can see with charts, but that I don't think your average professional soldier would be absolutely certain with math in the setting. Like, they would for sure see the difference with a d12 versus a d4. But a d6 versus a d8? I think the average one point of damage that they'd see, if they saw a ton of fighting with those weapons, would be something they likely chalked up to small sample size, or they would confirmation basis. Or at least many would. I've seen people argue about guns, and calibers, and ranges forever. They've linked charts, dummy tests, stories, reports from battlefield medics. And they still don't agree. They can oftentimes not agree on which one is meaningfully more damaging to the health of a human body at all, or if being that much more damaging actually is meaningful in a fight. To me that just makes it more obvious that that PCs couldn't honestly prove that one was worse than other when it was a minor discrepancy. Because in real life, with all the information we have. You still have gun nuts argue til they're purple in the face that no, their chosen gun is the d8 and the other one is the d6. I don't see why it'd be any different in DnD unless you wanted to metagame which is just fine. Or they did do the orc stabby test a few thousand times and found that yes, this weapon is marginally better. To me as a player, I wouldn't really sweat it. Unless it was either a very large mechanical difference. Like a str barbarian using a single dagger, which would come across as inane in and out of universe, or we were just playing a campaign based around winning a series of narrative free combat encounters in a void. Which isn't an insult, it's a totally chill way to play the game, and the only one I'd feel raw over. Though honestly, if I felt like I really wanted my roman legionnaire to use a shortsword for flavor, I'd ask my GM if I could just reskin a rapier as a shortsword. That way we all win, and I can't make a reasonable argument for why a GM might turn down that request. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighter Weapon Choice
Top