Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighter Weapon Choice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Staccat0" data-source="post: 6629270" data-attributes="member: 6695548"><p>Sorry, I meant opponent as in "potential opponents" as in people the PC meets. Reffering to the people that a PC is drawn or drafted from when recruiting people willing to go on an adventure. I can see how my wording was confusing.</p><p></p><p>I sincerely doubt that a foolhardy gang of murder-hobos l would turn YOU away just because you didn't have a machine gun and were using a "sub optimal pistol" or whatever. Also, I'll take a ride to work even if your car is sub-optimal, and I doubt either of us are as skilled as a fighter or driver or whatever, ya know?</p><p></p><p>Historically militias and vigilantes use whatever is around. Really, really major battles were fought and won with people wearing crappy armor and using crappy weapons. It turns out people aren't that picky about who can lay their lives on the line for them.</p><p>(Heck, the US Military has done it multiple times in recent history. I doubt other countries soldiers crack jokes)</p><p></p><p>Perhaps a well trained soldier or guard might be rude, but a villager might also be afriad of a half-orc! An elf might say something rude to a dwarf! A burly guard might also mock a puny bard or mage! It shouldn't dissuade a player from playing one, or worse somehow encourage a DM to take their fun away and have people refuse to work with them in game.</p><p></p><p>And honestly, it's kind of a moot point, because the 5e DMG openly encourages you to adjust things for flavor by simply swapping them. If I were somehow bothered by the credulity of a player using a sub optimal weapon I would just say "Hey friend, go ahead and take the stats for a rapier and we'll just call it a short-sword on your character sheet. Thanks for coming over."</p><p></p><p>The rules for HP and damage in D&D are so hysterically abstract and goofy it seems weird to get hung up on the realism of it as seen through the eyes of an NPC. How does that guard treat a monk who signs up for a quest? Does he know my stat block and class BEFORE he makes jokes about my weapon? Does he check to see if I am a multi-class or a sorcerer or something first or what? Wouldn't every guy and gal with nice armor be someone you at least ASSUME has the POTENTIAL to have a weird magic short sword that turns everything it hits into a toad before he says anything too snarky?</p><p></p><p> I don't really care what my players use, I'm not gonna shame them over math. That's like inviting someone over to your house and yelling at them for not liking asparagus. I just can't see the POINT in caring, but your group and mileage may vary.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Staccat0, post: 6629270, member: 6695548"] Sorry, I meant opponent as in "potential opponents" as in people the PC meets. Reffering to the people that a PC is drawn or drafted from when recruiting people willing to go on an adventure. I can see how my wording was confusing. I sincerely doubt that a foolhardy gang of murder-hobos l would turn YOU away just because you didn't have a machine gun and were using a "sub optimal pistol" or whatever. Also, I'll take a ride to work even if your car is sub-optimal, and I doubt either of us are as skilled as a fighter or driver or whatever, ya know? Historically militias and vigilantes use whatever is around. Really, really major battles were fought and won with people wearing crappy armor and using crappy weapons. It turns out people aren't that picky about who can lay their lives on the line for them. (Heck, the US Military has done it multiple times in recent history. I doubt other countries soldiers crack jokes) Perhaps a well trained soldier or guard might be rude, but a villager might also be afriad of a half-orc! An elf might say something rude to a dwarf! A burly guard might also mock a puny bard or mage! It shouldn't dissuade a player from playing one, or worse somehow encourage a DM to take their fun away and have people refuse to work with them in game. And honestly, it's kind of a moot point, because the 5e DMG openly encourages you to adjust things for flavor by simply swapping them. If I were somehow bothered by the credulity of a player using a sub optimal weapon I would just say "Hey friend, go ahead and take the stats for a rapier and we'll just call it a short-sword on your character sheet. Thanks for coming over." The rules for HP and damage in D&D are so hysterically abstract and goofy it seems weird to get hung up on the realism of it as seen through the eyes of an NPC. How does that guard treat a monk who signs up for a quest? Does he know my stat block and class BEFORE he makes jokes about my weapon? Does he check to see if I am a multi-class or a sorcerer or something first or what? Wouldn't every guy and gal with nice armor be someone you at least ASSUME has the POTENTIAL to have a weird magic short sword that turns everything it hits into a toad before he says anything too snarky? I don't really care what my players use, I'm not gonna shame them over math. That's like inviting someone over to your house and yelling at them for not liking asparagus. I just can't see the POINT in caring, but your group and mileage may vary. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighter Weapon Choice
Top