Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fighters -must- wear heavy armor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cadfan" data-source="post: 4050618" data-attributes="member: 40961"><p>If this is true, I will be happy. My fear is that the rogue did <em>not</em> kill the swashbuckler and take his stuff, that rather the rogue is what I will be <em>told</em> to play because the swashbuckler isn't there.</p><p></p><p>The 3e swashbuckler, while a heavily flawed class, got some things very right.</p><p></p><p>Flaws:</p><p></p><p>1: Giving abilities that removed flaws in the rules-implementation of the swashbuckler archetype, and assuming that this counted as giving the class its ability for that level. Weapon Finesse and Insightful Strike, while both abilities that I think definitely needed to be included, fall into this category. The flaw in the way the rules treat swashbucklers is that dexterity is key for the archetype, but dexterity does not naturally increase attack bonus or damage. That means that this flaw must be fixed to make a swashbuckler possible. Weapon Finesse and Insightful Strike both remedy this problem, but all this accomplishes is bringing the Swashbuckler back up to par. Unfortunately, paying two class abilities between levels 1 and 3 in order to meet par for level 1 is not good, because now you're two levels behind. A lot of what is wrong with the swashbuckler could be met by giving out two early bonus feats to make up for this.</p><p></p><p>2: Important abilities are received too late. Past level 14, the swashbuckler is a solid critical hit machine. With Improved Critical and a rapier, you can receive a slow but relatively reliable stream of critical hits that slowly weaken your foe. But you have to make it to level 14 for this to work, and that involves traveling through a long list of very weak levels.</p><p></p><p>3: Too many abilities are just a hair on the weak side. Often they can be fixed with feats, but you have no surplus of feats.</p><p></p><p>4: Slippery Mind lets you fail your save twice. Grr. Pet peeve of mine.</p><p></p><p>Successes:</p><p></p><p>1: Intelligence to damage was a quick way to increase the damage of a dexterity based fighter, while also allowing the character class to focus on its other schtick- skills.</p><p></p><p>2: The dodge bonus. The flaw with the feat "dodge" is that its so much bookkeeping for a single +1 to ac. A class ability that helps raise that is nice. Noting a single opponent per round and receiving +3 ac versus that opponent is actually worthwhile, and is an archetype-appropriate way to increase armor class. Unfortunately this ability is not strong enough out of the gate- one of the lessons that seems to have been learned in Book of Nine Swords is that abilities like +X to AC (unlike +X to damage) inherently scale: +4 to AC is just as valuable at level 1 as it is at level 20. This means there's no reason to start a character with +1 and slowly raise him to +4; you can start at +4 right away. But that set aside, the idea was a very good one.</p><p></p><p>3: Special effects on critical hits. Fits the archetype, fits the traditional weapon choice, and is quite useful.</p><p></p><p>4: Taking 10 on certain skill checks. This makes them reliable, and means that you will use them in combat more often- letting you do more cool acrobatics than you otherwise might.</p><p></p><p>Editted to add: I should have addressed bucklers. I don't consider this a flaw or success in the swashbuckler, but they're something that needed addressed. I can't figure out whether the designers expected swashbucklers to use bucklers even though they're non proficient, since a masterwork buckler has no penalty for non proficiency, or whether the designers assumed that swashbucklers would not be using bucklers. This comes up with every class that has a free hand and no shield proficiecy, and needed to be resolved. A buckler is a cheap source of a few extra points of AC at medium to high levels, and needs to be more explicitly included or excluded from a class.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cadfan, post: 4050618, member: 40961"] If this is true, I will be happy. My fear is that the rogue did [I]not[/I] kill the swashbuckler and take his stuff, that rather the rogue is what I will be [I]told[/I] to play because the swashbuckler isn't there. The 3e swashbuckler, while a heavily flawed class, got some things very right. Flaws: 1: Giving abilities that removed flaws in the rules-implementation of the swashbuckler archetype, and assuming that this counted as giving the class its ability for that level. Weapon Finesse and Insightful Strike, while both abilities that I think definitely needed to be included, fall into this category. The flaw in the way the rules treat swashbucklers is that dexterity is key for the archetype, but dexterity does not naturally increase attack bonus or damage. That means that this flaw must be fixed to make a swashbuckler possible. Weapon Finesse and Insightful Strike both remedy this problem, but all this accomplishes is bringing the Swashbuckler back up to par. Unfortunately, paying two class abilities between levels 1 and 3 in order to meet par for level 1 is not good, because now you're two levels behind. A lot of what is wrong with the swashbuckler could be met by giving out two early bonus feats to make up for this. 2: Important abilities are received too late. Past level 14, the swashbuckler is a solid critical hit machine. With Improved Critical and a rapier, you can receive a slow but relatively reliable stream of critical hits that slowly weaken your foe. But you have to make it to level 14 for this to work, and that involves traveling through a long list of very weak levels. 3: Too many abilities are just a hair on the weak side. Often they can be fixed with feats, but you have no surplus of feats. 4: Slippery Mind lets you fail your save twice. Grr. Pet peeve of mine. Successes: 1: Intelligence to damage was a quick way to increase the damage of a dexterity based fighter, while also allowing the character class to focus on its other schtick- skills. 2: The dodge bonus. The flaw with the feat "dodge" is that its so much bookkeeping for a single +1 to ac. A class ability that helps raise that is nice. Noting a single opponent per round and receiving +3 ac versus that opponent is actually worthwhile, and is an archetype-appropriate way to increase armor class. Unfortunately this ability is not strong enough out of the gate- one of the lessons that seems to have been learned in Book of Nine Swords is that abilities like +X to AC (unlike +X to damage) inherently scale: +4 to AC is just as valuable at level 1 as it is at level 20. This means there's no reason to start a character with +1 and slowly raise him to +4; you can start at +4 right away. But that set aside, the idea was a very good one. 3: Special effects on critical hits. Fits the archetype, fits the traditional weapon choice, and is quite useful. 4: Taking 10 on certain skill checks. This makes them reliable, and means that you will use them in combat more often- letting you do more cool acrobatics than you otherwise might. Editted to add: I should have addressed bucklers. I don't consider this a flaw or success in the swashbuckler, but they're something that needed addressed. I can't figure out whether the designers expected swashbucklers to use bucklers even though they're non proficient, since a masterwork buckler has no penalty for non proficiency, or whether the designers assumed that swashbucklers would not be using bucklers. This comes up with every class that has a free hand and no shield proficiecy, and needed to be resolved. A buckler is a cheap source of a few extra points of AC at medium to high levels, and needs to be more explicitly included or excluded from a class. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Fighters -must- wear heavy armor
Top