Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighters vs. Spellcasters (a case for fighters.)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ranes" data-source="post: 6201295" data-attributes="member: 4826"><p>I apologise if my disinterest in engaging you on a bulletin board about about issues you consider - and which I might agree - problematic or vague appeared hostile.</p><p></p><p>If you were gaming under me, in the first instance I would ask that you didn't; I prefer a chair. I would be happy to discuss my interpretations of rules you considered problematic or vague if you thought they would inhibit or influence your choice of class, race, skills, feats, games, spells, items and so forth. Preferably, we could attend to this before the game.</p><p></p><p>If you disagreed with any of my interpretations and gave me a reasonable alternative, I would accept it with thanks and made sure all the other players present were made aware of it. I doubt that we would reasonably cover off all the possible rulings because some situations - I'm sure you would agree - would serve to highlight concerns neither of us had considered beforehand. That's why we have GMs.</p><p></p><p>In the event of your disagreement with me during a game, if you could swiftly point out my error (and here for the sake of argument I'm assuming I am in error), I will correct my mistake there and then - rewinding time in the game if the error applies to that instant or otherwise compensating for it as soon as possible.</p><p></p><p>If my subsequent ruling fails to satisfy you, I will nevertheless proceed for the sake of the game not getting bogged down. I will, however, point out to you that I'm willing to seriously listen to and attempt to address your concerns, in good faith, after the session. If at that point, I feel I have erred to the disadvantage of any player in the group, I will seek to make suitable amends to all concerned thereafter. If we nevertheless end with an impasse in which we both feel that our ruling is the - shall we say - more correct, I would hope that you would nevertheless accept that I am attempting to rule fairly and that we can proceed on that basis. If we cannot see eye to eye at that point, it might be for the best if we shake hands on it and part company, at least as far as the game is concerned, and leave it at that.</p><p></p><p>I have never found myself in that situation and I hope I never do. I also hope this addresses your magnificently fluorescent question.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ranes, post: 6201295, member: 4826"] I apologise if my disinterest in engaging you on a bulletin board about about issues you consider - and which I might agree - problematic or vague appeared hostile. If you were gaming under me, in the first instance I would ask that you didn't; I prefer a chair. I would be happy to discuss my interpretations of rules you considered problematic or vague if you thought they would inhibit or influence your choice of class, race, skills, feats, games, spells, items and so forth. Preferably, we could attend to this before the game. If you disagreed with any of my interpretations and gave me a reasonable alternative, I would accept it with thanks and made sure all the other players present were made aware of it. I doubt that we would reasonably cover off all the possible rulings because some situations - I'm sure you would agree - would serve to highlight concerns neither of us had considered beforehand. That's why we have GMs. In the event of your disagreement with me during a game, if you could swiftly point out my error (and here for the sake of argument I'm assuming I am in error), I will correct my mistake there and then - rewinding time in the game if the error applies to that instant or otherwise compensating for it as soon as possible. If my subsequent ruling fails to satisfy you, I will nevertheless proceed for the sake of the game not getting bogged down. I will, however, point out to you that I'm willing to seriously listen to and attempt to address your concerns, in good faith, after the session. If at that point, I feel I have erred to the disadvantage of any player in the group, I will seek to make suitable amends to all concerned thereafter. If we nevertheless end with an impasse in which we both feel that our ruling is the - shall we say - more correct, I would hope that you would nevertheless accept that I am attempting to rule fairly and that we can proceed on that basis. If we cannot see eye to eye at that point, it might be for the best if we shake hands on it and part company, at least as far as the game is concerned, and leave it at that. I have never found myself in that situation and I hope I never do. I also hope this addresses your magnificently fluorescent question. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighters vs. Spellcasters (a case for fighters.)
Top