Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Wicht" data-source="post: 6204743" data-attributes="member: 221">There are too many variables to answer that question?&nbsp; Who is the unconscious witness? Have the players successfully identified him as having a clue? Have they tracked him down? What spell?I don't think you really understand how I &quot;balance&quot; casters, no offense. Your comments seem to illustrate that you do not.The fact that you even think this would be a primary, secondary or tertiary consideration reveals your lack of understanding of my thinking in this regards.Your assertion of cherry picking lacks evidence. Provide some or stop making the accusation please.Please reread my original quote. I mentioned player choices making the reveal of such information warranted. Again you assertions lacks evidence and demonstrates you are not actually arguing against anything I am saying, you are just throwing around assertions of bad DMing and making a variety of mistaken assumptions because you are assuming things not actually being said. You are again making assertions that are not, as I perceive them, borne out by the actual conversation. Most of us are tossing out hypotheticals of possibilities rather than any illustrations of typical game play. That you would assume the hypothetical to be the norm illustrates your continued assumption of bad faith on the part of other DMs and their interactions with their players.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Wicht, post: 6204743, member: 221"] There are too many variables to answer that question? Who is the unconscious witness? Have the players successfully identified him as having a clue? Have they tracked him down? What spell? I don't think you really understand how I "balance" casters, no offense. Your comments seem to illustrate that you do not. The fact that you even think this would be a primary, secondary or tertiary consideration reveals your lack of understanding of my thinking in this regards. Your assertion of cherry picking lacks evidence. Provide some or stop making the accusation please. Please reread my original quote. I mentioned player choices making the reveal of such information warranted. Again you assertions lacks evidence and demonstrates you are not actually arguing against anything I am saying, you are just throwing around assertions of bad DMing and making a variety of mistaken assumptions because you are assuming things not actually being said. You are again making assertions that are not, as I perceive them, borne out by the actual conversation. Most of us are tossing out hypotheticals of possibilities rather than any illustrations of typical game play. That you would assume the hypothetical to be the norm illustrates your continued assumption of bad faith on the part of other DMs and their interactions with their players. [/QUOTE]

Verification