Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 6205980" data-attributes="member: 22779">You've dropped that line, "most generous possible spell interpretation" a few times.  Can you point to a couple of examples in this thread where anyone has done this?  I mean, if it's been so prevalent that you feel the need to comment, then I would think that such examples would be easy to find. I mean, you're the one who has taken the word "hazardous" to mean "automatically life threatening".  Which is 100% accurate.  Hazardous can mean life threatening.  That's true.  But, that's the most restrictive interpretation you can make.  I said that hazardous could be dealing damage (probably not life threatening, but, possibly) or some other unspecified interpretation.  It was the stated limitation to Gate that the (effective) god of a plane would stop casters from gating Noble Genies.  You're the one who insisted that it was in the intent of the rules to choose the most restrictive interpretation in order to limit caster power.  Can you show instances where you feel that we've given the most generous interpretations to the spells?</blockquote>