Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighters vs. Spellcasters (a case for fighters.)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wicht" data-source="post: 6211040" data-attributes="member: 221"><p>I know that James Jacobs, among others, has suggested simulacrum works best as an NPC spell and that it requires a DM to give careful consideration to what powers can or cannot be used by the created. I think that's right. Its definitely a spell that everyone acknowledges demands by its very nature, DM fiat when used by PCs. But even so, players who want to abuse the spell have no ground to stand on, via the spell text, to demand specific spell casting abilities for their creation. It is up to the DM to decide what is appropriate for the creature to have. </p><p></p><p>As stated above, I would not allow any PC, sans additional spells, to create a creature that has spellcasting abilities or spell like abilities. I would dictate that much as crafting a magic item requires additional spells to power each effect, you must cast the spells themselves to give your creation access to the spells or spell like abilities. That is, think of the simulacrum in terms of crafting a magical item and you get some guidelines as to how it might work best. But even besides this, any spell or spell like ability above 6th level (ie. wish) should just a non-starter regardless of the creature (again sans additional crafting requirements). </p><p></p><p>As for NPC creation/use of the spell, it happens off-screen and one can always assume they provided the necessary ingredients and spells to power the spell to create the NPC simulacrum desired.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wicht, post: 6211040, member: 221"] I know that James Jacobs, among others, has suggested simulacrum works best as an NPC spell and that it requires a DM to give careful consideration to what powers can or cannot be used by the created. I think that's right. Its definitely a spell that everyone acknowledges demands by its very nature, DM fiat when used by PCs. But even so, players who want to abuse the spell have no ground to stand on, via the spell text, to demand specific spell casting abilities for their creation. It is up to the DM to decide what is appropriate for the creature to have. As stated above, I would not allow any PC, sans additional spells, to create a creature that has spellcasting abilities or spell like abilities. I would dictate that much as crafting a magic item requires additional spells to power each effect, you must cast the spells themselves to give your creation access to the spells or spell like abilities. That is, think of the simulacrum in terms of crafting a magical item and you get some guidelines as to how it might work best. But even besides this, any spell or spell like ability above 6th level (ie. wish) should just a non-starter regardless of the creature (again sans additional crafting requirements). As for NPC creation/use of the spell, it happens off-screen and one can always assume they provided the necessary ingredients and spells to power the spell to create the NPC simulacrum desired. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighters vs. Spellcasters (a case for fighters.)
Top