Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighters vs. Spellcasters (a case for fighters.)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nogray" data-source="post: 6242043" data-attributes="member: 28028"><p>The rules for item creation seem to indicate that you can always share prerequisites. The wording of the feats always is about "you" meeting the prerequisite or knowing the spell, but the rules for item creation say this:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I suppose it could be interpreted differently, but the feat statement would seem to be modified by the caveat in the item creation rules, above. This is supported by the identical language from the various creation feats. For scrolls, potions, wands, and staffs, that verbiage is as follows:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The only difference between that and the other items (rods, wondrous items, weapons, armor) is the addition of the phrase, "If spells are involved in the prerequisites for making the [item]." (Oddly, rings have different verbiage.) This distinction is likely because there are some items from that set that do not have spells as a prerequisite, whereas potions, scrolls, and the like all have spells as prerequisites. Those prerequisites still seem to fall under the umbrella of the parenthetical "... access through another magic item or spellcaster is allowed."</p><p></p><p>Though the quoted text is from the online SRD, I found similar language in my perusal of my (3.5) DMG.</p><p></p><p>----</p><p></p><p>On the main topic, this has been a fascinating thread to read. I'd like to thank all the participants for their thoughts and insights.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nogray, post: 6242043, member: 28028"] The rules for item creation seem to indicate that you can always share prerequisites. The wording of the feats always is about "you" meeting the prerequisite or knowing the spell, but the rules for item creation say this: I suppose it could be interpreted differently, but the feat statement would seem to be modified by the caveat in the item creation rules, above. This is supported by the identical language from the various creation feats. For scrolls, potions, wands, and staffs, that verbiage is as follows: The only difference between that and the other items (rods, wondrous items, weapons, armor) is the addition of the phrase, "If spells are involved in the prerequisites for making the [item]." (Oddly, rings have different verbiage.) This distinction is likely because there are some items from that set that do not have spells as a prerequisite, whereas potions, scrolls, and the like all have spells as prerequisites. Those prerequisites still seem to fall under the umbrella of the parenthetical "... access through another magic item or spellcaster is allowed." Though the quoted text is from the online SRD, I found similar language in my perusal of my (3.5) DMG. ---- On the main topic, this has been a fascinating thread to read. I'd like to thank all the participants for their thoughts and insights. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fighters vs. Spellcasters (a case for fighters.)
Top