Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Figurines of Wondrous Power
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Colmarr" data-source="post: 5130316" data-attributes="member: 59182"><p>I see your logic here but I'm note sure I agree with it. </p><p> </p><p>#1 assumes that something can't be both a conjuration and an ally, and I don't see why that's the case. For example, a Jade Macetail is specifically called out as a "large medium animate" - it is for classification purposes a creature. </p><p> </p><p>Why exactly can't a conjuration be an ally? And if a conjuration can't be an ally, then by extension mustn't you also say that they can't be an enemy (and therefore FoWP can't be the targets of "any enemy" powers)?</p><p> </p><p>#3 confuses attacks with actions. A FoWP can attack, but it must be commanded to do so by someone else using their actions. The fact that is takes only a minor action to command a FoWP to make a standard action attack is a pretty strong indication that the FoWP is somehow doing <em>something</em> of its own initiative.</p><p> </p><p>And continuing the "by extension" review, if a FoWP "has no attacks of their own" and therefore cannot flank, mustn't the same argument be applied to ranger beastmaster companions? They can't take independent actions unless their master is unconscious, so by analogy should be unable to flank while the ranger is conscious.</p><p> </p><p>To be honest, I don't see how anyone could reach the conclusion you mention about #4. "Not being under an effect that prevents X" is not the same as "you must be able to X". Not even close. If anything, this is a RAI argument and has no place in a RAW discussion.</p><p> </p><p>EDIT: I'm specifically only discussing FoWP here. I make no suggestion that my points apply to all summons or all conjurations. As others have pointed out, FoWP have unique and somewhat quirky rules, so even if they <em>can</em> flank, that's no indication that summons and conjurations can. They might be able to, but I'm not familiar enough with the general summoning and conjuration rules to get into the discussion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Colmarr, post: 5130316, member: 59182"] I see your logic here but I'm note sure I agree with it. #1 assumes that something can't be both a conjuration and an ally, and I don't see why that's the case. For example, a Jade Macetail is specifically called out as a "large medium animate" - it is for classification purposes a creature. Why exactly can't a conjuration be an ally? And if a conjuration can't be an ally, then by extension mustn't you also say that they can't be an enemy (and therefore FoWP can't be the targets of "any enemy" powers)? #3 confuses attacks with actions. A FoWP can attack, but it must be commanded to do so by someone else using their actions. The fact that is takes only a minor action to command a FoWP to make a standard action attack is a pretty strong indication that the FoWP is somehow doing [I]something[/I] of its own initiative. And continuing the "by extension" review, if a FoWP "has no attacks of their own" and therefore cannot flank, mustn't the same argument be applied to ranger beastmaster companions? They can't take independent actions unless their master is unconscious, so by analogy should be unable to flank while the ranger is conscious. To be honest, I don't see how anyone could reach the conclusion you mention about #4. "Not being under an effect that prevents X" is not the same as "you must be able to X". Not even close. If anything, this is a RAI argument and has no place in a RAW discussion. EDIT: I'm specifically only discussing FoWP here. I make no suggestion that my points apply to all summons or all conjurations. As others have pointed out, FoWP have unique and somewhat quirky rules, so even if they [I]can[/I] flank, that's no indication that summons and conjurations can. They might be able to, but I'm not familiar enough with the general summoning and conjuration rules to get into the discussion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Figurines of Wondrous Power
Top