Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
File-Sharing: Has it affected the RPG industry?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="woodelf" data-source="post: 1558433" data-attributes="member: 10201"><p>The "large" in front of "corporation" in my post wasn't an accident, or redundant emphasis. I honestly see little or nothing that Disney, Time-Warner, Haliburton, Sony, WalMart, or other megacorporations--the sort with the power to push gov'ts around--has done that is a massive good, or necessary to society. Feel free to enlighten me--i could very well be overlooking things, due to ignorance of the accomplishments, or the accomplishers, that would change my POV on the matter. But, currently i am aware of a *lot* of ill that those size corporations have done to society, and very little good. Particularly those built around IP. If large corps used their economies of scale to raise wages, rather than lower prices, i'd be much mor sympathetic, frex. I'm much more sympathetic to the economies of scale argument when it comes to things that clearly benefit society, even if the means are less than desirable--medical research, frex.</p><p></p><p>So, yes, i'm fully aware that large corporations can achieve things that small ones can not. I'm not fully convinced they are more efficient than gov't organizations--i think they have different sorts of inefficiencies. The drive of profit causes inefficiencies in much the same way that the lack of profit-drive causes inefficiencies in many gov't activities. </p><p></p><p>Pre-industrial? Not a chance. Pseudo-socialist? Maybe. Canada doesn't seem to work any less well than the US does. To be clear, i'm not saying that we could've gotten where we are without free-market capitalism. But i'm also not convinced that it's the pinnacle of societal development, and no future changes could ever improve on it.</p><p></p><p>As for capitalism: in the strictest sense (absentee ownership, via investment) i *do* have questions as to its value. But i haven't seen (or come up with) a better solution. The fact that it's the least-evil economic model is not the same as saying it's a good economic model. The biggest flaw in capitalism is that the corporation is beholden, first and foremost, to the stockholders. Not the consumers. Not the producers (the employees). Therefore, there are market forces that can drive a company to do something that is good for neither the employees nor the consumers or, more often, not good for the employees. I'm not against capitalism, per se, i simply don't blindly accept that it's the be-all and end-all of economic structures. </p><p></p><p>And, in any case, i really don't see what this has to do, one way or the other, with a discussion of the state of the RPG industry as a whole (Hasbro is the only player that *might* fall into the "too big" category by my standards), or the nature of IP vis-a-vis piracy, or with my fitness to have a valid, reasoned, and/or reasonable opinion. Are you really going to now discount any statements i previously made that you thought were reasonable (assuming there were any) just because you consider a different opinion of mine ludicrous or foolish? Should'nt you judge ideas and arguments on their own basis, not the basis of who uttered them?</p><p></p><p>Oh, and looking back at my post, there is one things that was rather unclear: i don't actually download RPGs from WotC "because they're the bad guys", i have simply tried to reason through the consequences and decided that, <em>if</em> i were to only download from the megacorps, i'd be doing more good than harm, and if everyone followed my standard, likewise. Likewise, <em>if</em> i were to download from small, creator-owned companies, i'd be doing more harm than good. Given that, AFAIK, piracy affects the biggest producers the most, i see it distinctly targeting exactly the right people, for the most part, and thus the "if everyone did it" argument does not clearly argue against it, on consequences alone (it may argue against it, but it does not *clearly and unambiguously* argue against it). There are, however, other legal and moral arguments that do argue against free-for-all downloading. I just don't think that's necesasrily one of them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="woodelf, post: 1558433, member: 10201"] The "large" in front of "corporation" in my post wasn't an accident, or redundant emphasis. I honestly see little or nothing that Disney, Time-Warner, Haliburton, Sony, WalMart, or other megacorporations--the sort with the power to push gov'ts around--has done that is a massive good, or necessary to society. Feel free to enlighten me--i could very well be overlooking things, due to ignorance of the accomplishments, or the accomplishers, that would change my POV on the matter. But, currently i am aware of a *lot* of ill that those size corporations have done to society, and very little good. Particularly those built around IP. If large corps used their economies of scale to raise wages, rather than lower prices, i'd be much mor sympathetic, frex. I'm much more sympathetic to the economies of scale argument when it comes to things that clearly benefit society, even if the means are less than desirable--medical research, frex. So, yes, i'm fully aware that large corporations can achieve things that small ones can not. I'm not fully convinced they are more efficient than gov't organizations--i think they have different sorts of inefficiencies. The drive of profit causes inefficiencies in much the same way that the lack of profit-drive causes inefficiencies in many gov't activities. Pre-industrial? Not a chance. Pseudo-socialist? Maybe. Canada doesn't seem to work any less well than the US does. To be clear, i'm not saying that we could've gotten where we are without free-market capitalism. But i'm also not convinced that it's the pinnacle of societal development, and no future changes could ever improve on it. As for capitalism: in the strictest sense (absentee ownership, via investment) i *do* have questions as to its value. But i haven't seen (or come up with) a better solution. The fact that it's the least-evil economic model is not the same as saying it's a good economic model. The biggest flaw in capitalism is that the corporation is beholden, first and foremost, to the stockholders. Not the consumers. Not the producers (the employees). Therefore, there are market forces that can drive a company to do something that is good for neither the employees nor the consumers or, more often, not good for the employees. I'm not against capitalism, per se, i simply don't blindly accept that it's the be-all and end-all of economic structures. And, in any case, i really don't see what this has to do, one way or the other, with a discussion of the state of the RPG industry as a whole (Hasbro is the only player that *might* fall into the "too big" category by my standards), or the nature of IP vis-a-vis piracy, or with my fitness to have a valid, reasoned, and/or reasonable opinion. Are you really going to now discount any statements i previously made that you thought were reasonable (assuming there were any) just because you consider a different opinion of mine ludicrous or foolish? Should'nt you judge ideas and arguments on their own basis, not the basis of who uttered them? Oh, and looking back at my post, there is one things that was rather unclear: i don't actually download RPGs from WotC "because they're the bad guys", i have simply tried to reason through the consequences and decided that, [i]if[/i] i were to only download from the megacorps, i'd be doing more good than harm, and if everyone followed my standard, likewise. Likewise, [i]if[/i] i were to download from small, creator-owned companies, i'd be doing more harm than good. Given that, AFAIK, piracy affects the biggest producers the most, i see it distinctly targeting exactly the right people, for the most part, and thus the "if everyone did it" argument does not clearly argue against it, on consequences alone (it may argue against it, but it does not *clearly and unambiguously* argue against it). There are, however, other legal and moral arguments that do argue against free-for-all downloading. I just don't think that's necesasrily one of them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
File-Sharing: Has it affected the RPG industry?
Top