Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
File type discrimination
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Luke" data-source="post: 315252" data-attributes="member: 602"><p><strong>Re: Re: File type discrimination</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No. There is a genuine issue here.</p><p></p><p>PCGen are being restricted to only being allowed to distribute the WotC SRD content (no sword & fist, forgotten realms etc).</p><p></p><p>There's a long road ahead before they can *possibly* get permission to incorporate the Wizard's copyright IP for non-SRD material.</p><p></p><p>Essentially there is currently a prohibition on copyright material being distributed in PCGen format, whilst you can get the same material in E-Tools format from the "official" site.</p><p></p><p>Part of this material is in open XML format (made easier to work with in bulk by your program, Davin), where other software can import from it, whilst other information is held in proprietory format (.rac files and others), only readable by other E-Tools programs.</p><p></p><p>It should be noted, however, that Wizards own the IP to this copyright material, and are morally and legally within their rights to allow E-Tools proliferation of said material, effectively giving E-Tools a significant "competitive advantage" over PCGen and others. </p><p></p><p>There is a moral and legal issue, however, if their official site ends up distributing closed content from other D20 publishers. I predict it won't be long before they have to enforce certain acceptability guidelines about what's allowed on their site. There will probably be a backlash where WotC are accused of "locking into" only their own material, although it's the most they can legally do (without permission). Just wait and see... "poor" old WotC always get slagged one way or another, no matter what they do. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>This places WotC in what "used to be" the PCGen situation. In the days when there was only PCGen, D20 publishers could find advantage in allowing PCGen permission to distribute their copyright material. Now, WotC would appear to offer a much stronger future marketing advantage from that perspective. Looks like PCGen have started a nice campaign at GenCon with getting D20 publishers on-side for future distribution (announcement pending), but if E-Tools survives it's launch, the effect may be a bit temporary.</p><p></p><p>By the way, has anyone tried decoding the .rac or .chr file formats? I'd be surprised if there weren't a few PCGen coders having a close look. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> I had a quick look, and at the very least it seems the strings are in unicode format...</p><p>Davin??? Your helper is good, but it's incomplete... How about decoding those native formats for us? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> If only I had that much time.</p><p></p><p>I like efforts by people like Charles Greathouse, to get things like standard statblock formats. I've already started changing my own formats to make E-Tools imports easier...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Luke, post: 315252, member: 602"] [b]Re: Re: File type discrimination[/b] No. There is a genuine issue here. PCGen are being restricted to only being allowed to distribute the WotC SRD content (no sword & fist, forgotten realms etc). There's a long road ahead before they can *possibly* get permission to incorporate the Wizard's copyright IP for non-SRD material. Essentially there is currently a prohibition on copyright material being distributed in PCGen format, whilst you can get the same material in E-Tools format from the "official" site. Part of this material is in open XML format (made easier to work with in bulk by your program, Davin), where other software can import from it, whilst other information is held in proprietory format (.rac files and others), only readable by other E-Tools programs. It should be noted, however, that Wizards own the IP to this copyright material, and are morally and legally within their rights to allow E-Tools proliferation of said material, effectively giving E-Tools a significant "competitive advantage" over PCGen and others. There is a moral and legal issue, however, if their official site ends up distributing closed content from other D20 publishers. I predict it won't be long before they have to enforce certain acceptability guidelines about what's allowed on their site. There will probably be a backlash where WotC are accused of "locking into" only their own material, although it's the most they can legally do (without permission). Just wait and see... "poor" old WotC always get slagged one way or another, no matter what they do. ;) This places WotC in what "used to be" the PCGen situation. In the days when there was only PCGen, D20 publishers could find advantage in allowing PCGen permission to distribute their copyright material. Now, WotC would appear to offer a much stronger future marketing advantage from that perspective. Looks like PCGen have started a nice campaign at GenCon with getting D20 publishers on-side for future distribution (announcement pending), but if E-Tools survives it's launch, the effect may be a bit temporary. By the way, has anyone tried decoding the .rac or .chr file formats? I'd be surprised if there weren't a few PCGen coders having a close look. ;) I had a quick look, and at the very least it seems the strings are in unicode format... Davin??? Your helper is good, but it's incomplete... How about decoding those native formats for us? ;) If only I had that much time. I like efforts by people like Charles Greathouse, to get things like standard statblock formats. I've already started changing my own formats to make E-Tools imports easier... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
File type discrimination
Top