Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Filling out the Powers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GoodKingJayIII" data-source="post: 4134335" data-attributes="member: 13804"><p>You added the part about "filling in." You decided these ideas would be "ill-considered." (Arbitrarily, I might add.) I did not say those things. Please do not put words in my mouth. Your snark is unnecessary and unappreciated. Unless you want to change your tone, I won't be responding to you again. </p><p></p><p>I believe that Wizards had an opportunity to <em>show</em> us what each of these class types would look like. They did not decide to go in that direction; it's not going to keep me from buying the game. And as I said, it's a pretty small thing.</p><p></p><p>As it stands we have: 1 controller, 2 defenders, 2 leaders, and 3 strikers. I love variety, but did we really need 3 strikers? Were there no other possibilities for a controller other than a wizard?</p><p></p><p>Just because some symmetry turned out to be bad does not mean it all could or will be. I happen to think it could have been quite helpful and interesting, especially with the new edition coming.</p><p></p><p>This thread is supposed to be purely speculative, but also fun. Please don't come in here with your negativity and threadcrapping. If you want to do that, go somewhere else.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GoodKingJayIII, post: 4134335, member: 13804"] You added the part about "filling in." You decided these ideas would be "ill-considered." (Arbitrarily, I might add.) I did not say those things. Please do not put words in my mouth. Your snark is unnecessary and unappreciated. Unless you want to change your tone, I won't be responding to you again. I believe that Wizards had an opportunity to [I]show[/I] us what each of these class types would look like. They did not decide to go in that direction; it's not going to keep me from buying the game. And as I said, it's a pretty small thing. As it stands we have: 1 controller, 2 defenders, 2 leaders, and 3 strikers. I love variety, but did we really need 3 strikers? Were there no other possibilities for a controller other than a wizard? Just because some symmetry turned out to be bad does not mean it all could or will be. I happen to think it could have been quite helpful and interesting, especially with the new edition coming. This thread is supposed to be purely speculative, but also fun. Please don't come in here with your negativity and threadcrapping. If you want to do that, go somewhere else. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Filling out the Powers
Top