Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
FILM: National Treasure
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="barsoomcore" data-source="post: 1871602" data-attributes="member: 812"><p>And, isn't it kind of the POINT of film critics to be, you know, CRITICAL of films?</p><p></p><p>I mean, seriously.</p><p></p><p>Actually, I think it's useful to distinguish between REVIEWERS and CRITICS. A reviewer is just somebody who says, "I liked it or didn't like it and here's why." A critic is somebody who says, "Here's a viewpoint on this film and what it means."</p><p></p><p>The reviewer's job is to give appraisals of films that people come to count on -- whether they agree or not, at least you're providing them with information they feel like comes from a reliable source. Their primary statement is "I liked the film." Or the opposite.</p><p></p><p>The critic's job is to provide context for films, so that audiences as they watch the film can better appreciate what is or isn't being done by the film-makers. Whether or not they LIKE the film is actually beside the point.</p><p></p><p>Roger Ebert is a critic who writes reviews. He knows very very large amounts of stuff about cinema, and his website features critical commentaries on lots of films. A magazine like <em>Sight And Sound</em> is a critical magazine. A magazine like <em>Entertainment Weekly</em> is a review magazine. The former is for students of cinema who are looking for new ways to consider the medium. The latter is a guide for consumers of cinema to help them decide where to spend their money.</p><p></p><p>So critics are SUPPOSED to be elitist. That's their job, and if they don't do it, they aren't contributing anything to the art. Reviewers don't have to be.</p><p></p><p>Just to say pretty much whenever I see somebody say, "It's not brilliant but it's an entertaining mindless flick," I say, "It's a piece of crap, but it's the latest, shiniest piece of crap so people will go and see it."</p><p></p><p>But hey, I'm an elitist. I only like GOOD films. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="barsoomcore, post: 1871602, member: 812"] And, isn't it kind of the POINT of film critics to be, you know, CRITICAL of films? I mean, seriously. Actually, I think it's useful to distinguish between REVIEWERS and CRITICS. A reviewer is just somebody who says, "I liked it or didn't like it and here's why." A critic is somebody who says, "Here's a viewpoint on this film and what it means." The reviewer's job is to give appraisals of films that people come to count on -- whether they agree or not, at least you're providing them with information they feel like comes from a reliable source. Their primary statement is "I liked the film." Or the opposite. The critic's job is to provide context for films, so that audiences as they watch the film can better appreciate what is or isn't being done by the film-makers. Whether or not they LIKE the film is actually beside the point. Roger Ebert is a critic who writes reviews. He knows very very large amounts of stuff about cinema, and his website features critical commentaries on lots of films. A magazine like [i]Sight And Sound[/i] is a critical magazine. A magazine like [i]Entertainment Weekly[/i] is a review magazine. The former is for students of cinema who are looking for new ways to consider the medium. The latter is a guide for consumers of cinema to help them decide where to spend their money. So critics are SUPPOSED to be elitist. That's their job, and if they don't do it, they aren't contributing anything to the art. Reviewers don't have to be. Just to say pretty much whenever I see somebody say, "It's not brilliant but it's an entertaining mindless flick," I say, "It's a piece of crap, but it's the latest, shiniest piece of crap so people will go and see it." But hey, I'm an elitist. I only like GOOD films. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
FILM: National Treasure
Top