Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Finalized Hybrid Rules - What's new?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 5066418" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>There you go insulting people by saying how they cannot think like game designers, but you can. How they are missing stuff and forgetting stuff. Hmmm.</p><p></p><p>So far, the people who have played hybrids have posted that they are relatively weaker than normal PCs. A hybrid has fewer/weaker class features and has one feat less (for all intents and purposes). In exchange, the hybrid gets versatility, but no more versatility than a new class can get in a new splat book. Balance-wise, hybrids are inferior.</p><p></p><p>If you want to illustrate your point, <strong>prove it</strong>. Post a hybrid x/y PC where it is as strong or stronger in combat as class x and as strong or stronger in combat as class y. Go to a reasonable level like level 10 so that the attacks, defenses, hit points, DPR, healing, etc. can be illustrated and measured at various levels.</p><p></p><p>You seem to armchair quarterback quite a bit. You need to illustrate a bit more if your POV is going to be taken seriously.</p><p></p><p>We are, after all, only talking about a single feat here. If hybrids are typically weaker than non-hybrids (as most people designing them and/or playing them have seemed to notice), than a single feat should help balance it out a bit. But, you have to illustrate that hybrids can actually be stronger than non-hybrids for a single feat being too strong to give them having any validity.</p><p></p><p>Where's your data that seems to fly in the face of other people's analysis' and experiences? Most people who look at this notice that Hybrid Talent has to be used just for AC, let alone for anything else. You seem to ignore this. You seem to ignore that Cloth armor or Chain armor is actually pretty darn weak for many hybrids and that because the Hybrid PC uses Hybrid Talent for AC just to be competitive, other class features are mostly out of the question.</p><p></p><p>The Fighter / Wizard in cloth armor sucks dude. And even if he takes Arcane Implement Mastery, he will have a tough time fighting in melee as a Fighter and using that part of his versatility without taking a boatload of other feats. Gimp 101.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 5066418, member: 2011"] There you go insulting people by saying how they cannot think like game designers, but you can. How they are missing stuff and forgetting stuff. Hmmm. So far, the people who have played hybrids have posted that they are relatively weaker than normal PCs. A hybrid has fewer/weaker class features and has one feat less (for all intents and purposes). In exchange, the hybrid gets versatility, but no more versatility than a new class can get in a new splat book. Balance-wise, hybrids are inferior. If you want to illustrate your point, [b]prove it[/b]. Post a hybrid x/y PC where it is as strong or stronger in combat as class x and as strong or stronger in combat as class y. Go to a reasonable level like level 10 so that the attacks, defenses, hit points, DPR, healing, etc. can be illustrated and measured at various levels. You seem to armchair quarterback quite a bit. You need to illustrate a bit more if your POV is going to be taken seriously. We are, after all, only talking about a single feat here. If hybrids are typically weaker than non-hybrids (as most people designing them and/or playing them have seemed to notice), than a single feat should help balance it out a bit. But, you have to illustrate that hybrids can actually be stronger than non-hybrids for a single feat being too strong to give them having any validity. Where's your data that seems to fly in the face of other people's analysis' and experiences? Most people who look at this notice that Hybrid Talent has to be used just for AC, let alone for anything else. You seem to ignore this. You seem to ignore that Cloth armor or Chain armor is actually pretty darn weak for many hybrids and that because the Hybrid PC uses Hybrid Talent for AC just to be competitive, other class features are mostly out of the question. The Fighter / Wizard in cloth armor sucks dude. And even if he takes Arcane Implement Mastery, he will have a tough time fighting in melee as a Fighter and using that part of his versatility without taking a boatload of other feats. Gimp 101. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Finalized Hybrid Rules - What's new?
Top