Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Finally laid my eyes on Monte Cook's version of the Ranger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Green Knight" data-source="post: 143228" data-attributes="member: 2723"><p>Which can be found here: </p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.montecook.com/images/Ranger2.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.montecook.com/images/Ranger2.pdf</a> </p><p> </p><p>And I must say, it is one HELL of an improvement over the original class! </p><p> </p><p>For one, it's no longer as constrictive a class. If you don't want a Ranger who fights 2-weapon style then you don't have to have one, as rather than getting 2-weapon style fighting and ambidexterity, you get a bnus feat at 1st level (you still get Track for free). It's weaker than the normal Ranger, as you come out 1 Feat shorter, but it allows for more customization. So you can have a Ranger who's really good with a bow (Take Point Blank Shot and Precise Shot) rather than having a guy who fights 2-weapon style. </p><p> </p><p>And if you still want to fight 2-weapon style, then it's still better as they're REAL Feats, not virtual feats, and without restriction. So you'll still be able to fight 2-weapon style, even when using a double weapon (like a quarterstaff or a two-bladed sword), or when you're wearing medium armor. </p><p> </p><p>Also, you continue to gain bonus feats as you go up. Nowhere near as numerous as the Fighter, of course. You get them starting at 4th level, and every 3 levels after that (4, 7, 10, 13, 16, and 19). Of course the bonus feat list isn't an exact duplicate of the Fighters', as the Ranger is a different class and has its own set of preferred Feats. </p><p> </p><p>Monte's Ranger also offers a Reflex saving throw bonus, as well as a Fortitude save. Not to mention 6 skill points per level, rather than 4. </p><p> </p><p>You have a D8 hit die per level, which is cool. Nobody ever said the Ranger was supposed to be as hard as the Fighter. Ranger's still got his Favored Enemy and his spells, though his progression is sped up a little (just slightly, as the Ranger eventually ends up with 1 more 1st level spell than the normal PHB Ranger at 20th level. Not exactly a big deal). </p><p> </p><p>All in all, I love this Ranger! He's a lot more customizable as opposed to constrictive and isn't front-loaded. Not to mention giving you more of a reason to stick with the class into the higher levels, rather than just taking it for 1 level and then multi-classing into something else. I REALLY wish this had been the Ranger that had been put into the PHB. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /> </p><p> </p><p>So what're your opinions about Monte's Ranger? Like it? Dislike it? Wish WoTC would slip it into the PHB in a later printing? Discuss.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Green Knight, post: 143228, member: 2723"] Which can be found here: [url]http://www.montecook.com/images/Ranger2.pdf[/url] And I must say, it is one HELL of an improvement over the original class! For one, it's no longer as constrictive a class. If you don't want a Ranger who fights 2-weapon style then you don't have to have one, as rather than getting 2-weapon style fighting and ambidexterity, you get a bnus feat at 1st level (you still get Track for free). It's weaker than the normal Ranger, as you come out 1 Feat shorter, but it allows for more customization. So you can have a Ranger who's really good with a bow (Take Point Blank Shot and Precise Shot) rather than having a guy who fights 2-weapon style. And if you still want to fight 2-weapon style, then it's still better as they're REAL Feats, not virtual feats, and without restriction. So you'll still be able to fight 2-weapon style, even when using a double weapon (like a quarterstaff or a two-bladed sword), or when you're wearing medium armor. Also, you continue to gain bonus feats as you go up. Nowhere near as numerous as the Fighter, of course. You get them starting at 4th level, and every 3 levels after that (4, 7, 10, 13, 16, and 19). Of course the bonus feat list isn't an exact duplicate of the Fighters', as the Ranger is a different class and has its own set of preferred Feats. Monte's Ranger also offers a Reflex saving throw bonus, as well as a Fortitude save. Not to mention 6 skill points per level, rather than 4. You have a D8 hit die per level, which is cool. Nobody ever said the Ranger was supposed to be as hard as the Fighter. Ranger's still got his Favored Enemy and his spells, though his progression is sped up a little (just slightly, as the Ranger eventually ends up with 1 more 1st level spell than the normal PHB Ranger at 20th level. Not exactly a big deal). All in all, I love this Ranger! He's a lot more customizable as opposed to constrictive and isn't front-loaded. Not to mention giving you more of a reason to stick with the class into the higher levels, rather than just taking it for 1 level and then multi-classing into something else. I REALLY wish this had been the Ranger that had been put into the PHB. :( So what're your opinions about Monte's Ranger? Like it? Dislike it? Wish WoTC would slip it into the PHB in a later printing? Discuss. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Finally laid my eyes on Monte Cook's version of the Ranger
Top