Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Finally, the Obscure Elements Poll
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tovec" data-source="post: 5919260" data-attributes="member: 95493"><p>Not at all what I thought of when I voted for them, but I do like the thought.</p><p></p><p>For me its more about:</p><p></p><p>Cursed items and Intelligent items - allowing greater range of what makes magic items magical. And allowing the simple assumptions which permiated the previous couple editions to go away. If any item can be sentient, with its own will and goals then it adds a new level of awesome. It is like when that goblin surrenders and gives the reason for his hideous acts. The same goes for cursed items but in a different way, the party must be cautious about items they get instead of just assuming every weapon is a +2 sword of kickass they have to be weary that perhaps that item came to them because its previous master was unlucky enough to get it killed in the first place.</p><p>It isn't even like I use intelligent or cursed items very often but I certainly want to see their existence at some point coming up in 5th. They are just too cool to pass up. If I want to have use the items as plot related objects, like I would use certain NPCs, then I want to have rules related to them. I loved the idea behind the swords in the book of nine swords. I didn't like the execution, but the idea was brilliant. Giving a unique and personal twist for weapons, or armor or wondrous items or staffs or anything, adds a new layer of cool and complexity that I don't get if every item is just what it seems like and never changes.</p><p></p><p>As far as strongolds, I probably voted for this one differently than I suspect most did. I voted for strongholds for the party, not for the fighter <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue :P" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" /> I've used strongholds a couple of times in games and they really allowed for interesting and unique scenarios but I think they have been solely underused, especially at lower levels. I love the idea of the party hanging up their shingle and able to be found in just one place. I love the idea of giving them resources to protect or a PLACE to care about instead of just NPCs. I love the idea of NPCs coming and establishing a town around the stronghold, with the party being heroes strong and capable enough of protecting the little outpost in the middle of nowhere.</p><p>However, I think that strongholds don't really have very good rules attached to them to achieve such things that I want to do with them. That is why I voted, to see rules be created to allow me to drop such a thing into a campaign for my players to use. That would be glorious.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tovec, post: 5919260, member: 95493"] Not at all what I thought of when I voted for them, but I do like the thought. For me its more about: Cursed items and Intelligent items - allowing greater range of what makes magic items magical. And allowing the simple assumptions which permiated the previous couple editions to go away. If any item can be sentient, with its own will and goals then it adds a new level of awesome. It is like when that goblin surrenders and gives the reason for his hideous acts. The same goes for cursed items but in a different way, the party must be cautious about items they get instead of just assuming every weapon is a +2 sword of kickass they have to be weary that perhaps that item came to them because its previous master was unlucky enough to get it killed in the first place. It isn't even like I use intelligent or cursed items very often but I certainly want to see their existence at some point coming up in 5th. They are just too cool to pass up. If I want to have use the items as plot related objects, like I would use certain NPCs, then I want to have rules related to them. I loved the idea behind the swords in the book of nine swords. I didn't like the execution, but the idea was brilliant. Giving a unique and personal twist for weapons, or armor or wondrous items or staffs or anything, adds a new layer of cool and complexity that I don't get if every item is just what it seems like and never changes. As far as strongolds, I probably voted for this one differently than I suspect most did. I voted for strongholds for the party, not for the fighter :P I've used strongholds a couple of times in games and they really allowed for interesting and unique scenarios but I think they have been solely underused, especially at lower levels. I love the idea of the party hanging up their shingle and able to be found in just one place. I love the idea of giving them resources to protect or a PLACE to care about instead of just NPCs. I love the idea of NPCs coming and establishing a town around the stronghold, with the party being heroes strong and capable enough of protecting the little outpost in the middle of nowhere. However, I think that strongholds don't really have very good rules attached to them to achieve such things that I want to do with them. That is why I voted, to see rules be created to allow me to drop such a thing into a campaign for my players to use. That would be glorious. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Finally, the Obscure Elements Poll
Top