Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Find the Anime/Video games in 4e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 3973431" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>It seems to me that when people note videogame influence, they're usually noting "speed of play at the cost of verisimilitude."</p><p></p><p>Things like cheap resurrection magic. Makes the game flow nice, but how often did you wonder why you couldn't just cast <em>Life</em> to raise Aeris from the dead? (Of course, it's usually 'fluffed' out of the way by calling the 'hp falls to 0' condition KO or Swoon or something non-deadly)</p><p></p><p>Things like quest cards. It organizes the thoughts, but it kind of puts a control on quests arising organically from the game.</p><p></p><p>Things like 'refreshing' abilities. It helps you go without having a five-minute dungeon expedition, but it also means your use of power doesn't tire or exhaust you, except for a few moments.</p><p></p><p>Most of the versimilitude issues can be fluffed out of the way, if they even need to be. Calling 0 hp "Unconcious" and not "dead," making resurrection more like snapping out of an action-movie karate-chop coma. Quest cards that pertain directly to things arising organically from the PC's actions. Refreshing abilities as bursts of adrenaline.</p><p></p><p>But still, when most people are looking for the videogame influence, this is what they're looking at, because it's what videogames are famous for -- fun play that doesn't care much about the ramifications of it's rules beyond the play itself. PacMan didn't have a narrative, the Mushroom Kingdom was an excuse to run and jump, and Final Fantasy has often been accuse of being an excersise in "pressing a button to advance the plot to the next FMV" more than a game. D&D has to concern itself with a continuous world, so a lot of people see it as a bad influence, at least in large amounts, if 'realism' is eroded for quickness of play. In addition, there's always those people who take a sort of warped pride in how long and how thorough they are about the detail that D&D allows.</p><p></p><p>In this resepct, D&D4 is 'more videogame' than previous editions, mostly because of the stated goal to streamline everything, and the fact that these streamlining things are being explained away, rather than rising organically from the campaign. I just don't necessarily buy that streamlining the game is NECESSARILY treating it more like a videogame, but it is a common evolutionary trend in both D&D and in videogames. </p><p></p><p>IMO, a game like FFZ shows it's true colors more boldly. </p><p></p><p>Death is permenant. Characters just don't actually 'die' that often. They might fall unconcious, become 'swooned,' get 'KO'd', or even get captured (only to wake up later), but true death doesn't come from an accident of the dice. It comes from the player's choice to sacrifice themselves (and give their party some great benefits, and themselves a shiny new character or taking over an NPC role). </p><p></p><p>The Mission system is set up so that players get to choose which quests and side quests to explore. There is an obvious narrative, but the players aren't shoehorned into it, and the GM can manuever it around a lot from session to session.</p><p></p><p>MP is restored with every encounter, and HP can be healed with MP. The challenges more lie in individual encounters, especially in the great speed with which your HP can drop and the need to get healing available in a reasonable casting time that is significant enough to stop it from dropping. </p><p></p><p>Characters rarely miss. If they do, it's usually because of a special feature or peice of equipment. Hitting is the assumed norm, and characters vary in the types and sizes of damage dealt rather than in missing more often. </p><p></p><p>These are all directly videogame-inspired rules that make the game much, much more fun. They do require a different kind of suspension of disbelief than, say, 1e D&D did. It's not really game-breaking, though it probably is for some who prefer a feeling of more helpless characters. Which is why FFZ isn't necessarily for everyone. But it obviously is for those who enjoy both 4e and Final Fantasy. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 3973431, member: 2067"] It seems to me that when people note videogame influence, they're usually noting "speed of play at the cost of verisimilitude." Things like cheap resurrection magic. Makes the game flow nice, but how often did you wonder why you couldn't just cast [I]Life[/I] to raise Aeris from the dead? (Of course, it's usually 'fluffed' out of the way by calling the 'hp falls to 0' condition KO or Swoon or something non-deadly) Things like quest cards. It organizes the thoughts, but it kind of puts a control on quests arising organically from the game. Things like 'refreshing' abilities. It helps you go without having a five-minute dungeon expedition, but it also means your use of power doesn't tire or exhaust you, except for a few moments. Most of the versimilitude issues can be fluffed out of the way, if they even need to be. Calling 0 hp "Unconcious" and not "dead," making resurrection more like snapping out of an action-movie karate-chop coma. Quest cards that pertain directly to things arising organically from the PC's actions. Refreshing abilities as bursts of adrenaline. But still, when most people are looking for the videogame influence, this is what they're looking at, because it's what videogames are famous for -- fun play that doesn't care much about the ramifications of it's rules beyond the play itself. PacMan didn't have a narrative, the Mushroom Kingdom was an excuse to run and jump, and Final Fantasy has often been accuse of being an excersise in "pressing a button to advance the plot to the next FMV" more than a game. D&D has to concern itself with a continuous world, so a lot of people see it as a bad influence, at least in large amounts, if 'realism' is eroded for quickness of play. In addition, there's always those people who take a sort of warped pride in how long and how thorough they are about the detail that D&D allows. In this resepct, D&D4 is 'more videogame' than previous editions, mostly because of the stated goal to streamline everything, and the fact that these streamlining things are being explained away, rather than rising organically from the campaign. I just don't necessarily buy that streamlining the game is NECESSARILY treating it more like a videogame, but it is a common evolutionary trend in both D&D and in videogames. IMO, a game like FFZ shows it's true colors more boldly. Death is permenant. Characters just don't actually 'die' that often. They might fall unconcious, become 'swooned,' get 'KO'd', or even get captured (only to wake up later), but true death doesn't come from an accident of the dice. It comes from the player's choice to sacrifice themselves (and give their party some great benefits, and themselves a shiny new character or taking over an NPC role). The Mission system is set up so that players get to choose which quests and side quests to explore. There is an obvious narrative, but the players aren't shoehorned into it, and the GM can manuever it around a lot from session to session. MP is restored with every encounter, and HP can be healed with MP. The challenges more lie in individual encounters, especially in the great speed with which your HP can drop and the need to get healing available in a reasonable casting time that is significant enough to stop it from dropping. Characters rarely miss. If they do, it's usually because of a special feature or peice of equipment. Hitting is the assumed norm, and characters vary in the types and sizes of damage dealt rather than in missing more often. These are all directly videogame-inspired rules that make the game much, much more fun. They do require a different kind of suspension of disbelief than, say, 1e D&D did. It's not really game-breaking, though it probably is for some who prefer a feeling of more helpless characters. Which is why FFZ isn't necessarily for everyone. But it obviously is for those who enjoy both 4e and Final Fantasy. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Find the Anime/Video games in 4e
Top