Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fire Bolt vs other Wizzard offensive cantrips
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaelommiss" data-source="post: 6734188" data-attributes="member: 6775925"><p>A black dome is functionally identical to <em>darkness</em>*, with a reduced radius. Objects passing through an illusion reveals that the illusory object are not solid. In most cases this is sufficient evidence to believe it to be illusory since an illusion is generally of a solid object. Since magical darkness is also intangible, there is no reason to believe it is an illusion merely because an object passes through it. Without this major indicator revealing the true nature of the illusion, it incredibly difficult for a casual observer to identify the illusion as such, and therefore takes an action to investigate it. Nothing in <em>silent image</em>'s description suggests the spell ends when something touches it.</p><p></p><p>The way I read the spell description, the first sentence suggests a way to raise doubts regarding an illusion (oh! this door isn't solid). The second is the method to verify those doubts (I think I'll take a closer look at this door to figure out why my hand passed through it). The third is the result of succeeding on the check (it's an illusory door!). If merely touching the illusion was sufficient then anyone could use their environmental interaction to poke the potential illusion instead taking an action to examine it (and bypass any check, too!). It seems odd to me that a spell that outlines an action cost and ability check could be bypassed accidentally. </p><p></p><p>This is purely my own opinion on the spell, though hopefully it now makes sense why I rule the way I do. I tend to favour anything that helps players rely on interesting ideas rather than endlessly attacking the problem until it goes away, and ruling generously with illusions is one way to do that.</p><p></p><p>*I have seen some debate over the nature of magical darkness, though the majority tend to agree that it creates a dark bubble that can't been seen through. We operate according to this at my table because arguing about how a spell affects EM radiation is less fun than adventuring.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaelommiss, post: 6734188, member: 6775925"] A black dome is functionally identical to [I]darkness[/I]*, with a reduced radius. Objects passing through an illusion reveals that the illusory object are not solid. In most cases this is sufficient evidence to believe it to be illusory since an illusion is generally of a solid object. Since magical darkness is also intangible, there is no reason to believe it is an illusion merely because an object passes through it. Without this major indicator revealing the true nature of the illusion, it incredibly difficult for a casual observer to identify the illusion as such, and therefore takes an action to investigate it. Nothing in [I]silent image[/I]'s description suggests the spell ends when something touches it. The way I read the spell description, the first sentence suggests a way to raise doubts regarding an illusion (oh! this door isn't solid). The second is the method to verify those doubts (I think I'll take a closer look at this door to figure out why my hand passed through it). The third is the result of succeeding on the check (it's an illusory door!). If merely touching the illusion was sufficient then anyone could use their environmental interaction to poke the potential illusion instead taking an action to examine it (and bypass any check, too!). It seems odd to me that a spell that outlines an action cost and ability check could be bypassed accidentally. This is purely my own opinion on the spell, though hopefully it now makes sense why I rule the way I do. I tend to favour anything that helps players rely on interesting ideas rather than endlessly attacking the problem until it goes away, and ruling generously with illusions is one way to do that. *I have seen some debate over the nature of magical darkness, though the majority tend to agree that it creates a dark bubble that can't been seen through. We operate according to this at my table because arguing about how a spell affects EM radiation is less fun than adventuring. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fire Bolt vs other Wizzard offensive cantrips
Top