Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The_Ditto" data-source="post: 3297648" data-attributes="member: 30566">I know the rules support this (ie RAW) ... no argument .. however, I tend to look at Large creatures as 2x2x2 = 8 squares ... and Huge as 3x3x3 = 27 squares ... They are big - they are bulky .. and although the core rules don't really apply this too well, that Huge Target - beside the Medium ... occupies roughly 27 times the space on the combat ... (including the &quot;altitude&quot; component) ... It really brings out the &quot;Yeah, not likely going to tag the little guy ...&quot;.Maybe that's all that's needed ... in my example above (PWorm vs Toad, ie G vs D )D is .. what ... 1/2 ??G is .. 4x4x4 = 64 squares. (roughly 128:1)so 1 in 129 chance of tagging the Toad?Still goes back to what &quot;Hong&quot; said, though:&nbsp; That 1st level and 20th level archer both have the same chance of taggin the Toad?&nbsp; That still seems odd ... Wonder if we can adjust the figure further by BaB ??</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The_Ditto, post: 3297648, member: 30566"] I know the rules support this (ie RAW) ... no argument .. however, I tend to look at Large creatures as 2x2x2 = 8 squares ... and Huge as 3x3x3 = 27 squares ... They are big - they are bulky .. and although the core rules don't really apply this too well, that Huge Target - beside the Medium ... occupies roughly 27 times the space on the combat ... (including the "altitude" component) ... It really brings out the "Yeah, not likely going to tag the little guy ...". Maybe that's all that's needed ... in my example above (PWorm vs Toad, ie G vs D ) D is .. what ... 1/2 ?? G is .. 4x4x4 = 64 squares. (roughly 128:1) so 1 in 129 chance of tagging the Toad? Still goes back to what "Hong" said, though: That 1st level and 20th level archer both have the same chance of taggin the Toad? That still seems odd ... Wonder if we can adjust the figure further by BaB ?? [/QUOTE]

Verification