Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Firefly cancelled!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whodat" data-source="post: 619880" data-attributes="member: 7386"><p>Only if you look at from the perspective of “You (the viewer) don’t pay for these programs, so be happy with what you get.”</p><p></p><p>But I think you’re missing the bigger picture.</p><p></p><p>Networks go through a lot of effort trying to find out how many people watch certain programs at certain times. They also need to know which demographics watch what shows. This helps them know which advertisements to run during certain programs. </p><p></p><p>This research has even spawned its own industry. AC Nielsen harvests these numbers and in turn sells their data back to the networks. </p><p></p><p>Yes. They sell the information. It isn’t free.</p><p></p><p>So, in a hypothetical situation wherein a show (for this example, I’ll call it… “Farscape”) had a loyal following, but let’s say that the viewing numbers were not accurately represented in the Neilsen research data. Now let’s say that the network which airs Farscape (I’ll call them “Sci-Fi”) had shelled out money to AC Nielsen for their flawed research data. Would you say that the network “got what it paid for?”</p><p></p><p>Or look at the advertisers who paid money to the Sci-Fi channel for their airtime. Advertisers, who have been told which programs are being watched by key demographic audiences. Advertisers who can pull ads from programs which they deem offensive, or aren’t reaching the right audience. Would you say that the advertisers “got what they paid for?”</p><p></p><p>The problem, as I have stated before, is that the rating system is broken. If there are 250 million people in the U.S., and roughly 95% of the households have television sets, how can Neilsen Media Research poll only 5,000 households and call that a sampling? </p><p></p><p>I find it staggering that in an age of cell phones that e-mail, televisions that get 300+ channels via satellite, and self-adhesive postage stamps (don’t ask), NMR is relying on the same polling size that they were using twenty years ago.</p><p></p><p>I’ve heard it mentioned that NMR is “looking into” an eventual sampling of TiVo viewers – with no mention on why it hasn’t already happened, or how much longer it will take to implement. </p><p></p><p>When NMR finally starts looking into larger slices of what we actually are watching – then sponsors will be getting what they are paying for.</p><p></p><p>/End rant.</p><p></p><p>I do like your idea of a fan-based production company, though. </p><p></p><p>"I'd buy that for a dollar!"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whodat, post: 619880, member: 7386"] Only if you look at from the perspective of “You (the viewer) don’t pay for these programs, so be happy with what you get.” But I think you’re missing the bigger picture. Networks go through a lot of effort trying to find out how many people watch certain programs at certain times. They also need to know which demographics watch what shows. This helps them know which advertisements to run during certain programs. This research has even spawned its own industry. AC Nielsen harvests these numbers and in turn sells their data back to the networks. Yes. They sell the information. It isn’t free. So, in a hypothetical situation wherein a show (for this example, I’ll call it… “Farscape”) had a loyal following, but let’s say that the viewing numbers were not accurately represented in the Neilsen research data. Now let’s say that the network which airs Farscape (I’ll call them “Sci-Fi”) had shelled out money to AC Nielsen for their flawed research data. Would you say that the network “got what it paid for?” Or look at the advertisers who paid money to the Sci-Fi channel for their airtime. Advertisers, who have been told which programs are being watched by key demographic audiences. Advertisers who can pull ads from programs which they deem offensive, or aren’t reaching the right audience. Would you say that the advertisers “got what they paid for?” The problem, as I have stated before, is that the rating system is broken. If there are 250 million people in the U.S., and roughly 95% of the households have television sets, how can Neilsen Media Research poll only 5,000 households and call that a sampling? I find it staggering that in an age of cell phones that e-mail, televisions that get 300+ channels via satellite, and self-adhesive postage stamps (don’t ask), NMR is relying on the same polling size that they were using twenty years ago. I’ve heard it mentioned that NMR is “looking into” an eventual sampling of TiVo viewers – with no mention on why it hasn’t already happened, or how much longer it will take to implement. When NMR finally starts looking into larger slices of what we actually are watching – then sponsors will be getting what they are paying for. /End rant. I do like your idea of a fan-based production company, though. "I'd buy that for a dollar!" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Firefly cancelled!
Top