Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Firefly cancelled!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 627300" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>If you PROMISE that, if proof is provided, you will concede on this discussion and drop it, then I will go get the proof. Otherwise, it would be futile - I would be wasting my precious hours digging up info just so you can say "I need more, that doesn't persuade me". Deal?</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>I feel the percentage of sci-fi shows that are serialized is higher than non-sci-fi shows in a material way. Sure, there are episodic and serialied shows in all genres. I just think sci-fi has a significanltly higher perecentage than other genres.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>If you think your own arguement is not valid for Firefly...then why did you bring it up in THIS thread?</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Please don't be rude. That's the second time you have accused me of not paying sufficient attention to what you say, and you were wrong the first time so I would think you would be a bit mor polite about it the second time. We are having a discussion. We are going point by point, through dozens of points. If someone misses one thing, or misinterprets one thing, it doesn't mean they were not paying attention to what you were saying. Please be polite.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>You've said this however "<em>If the system is broken now, it has been so for years. If the networks really were making a good faith effort to fix it, then it would have gotten fixed. They've had the money and the time, if they really wished to apply it.</em>" </strong></p><p><strong>So by implication you feel the system should have been "fixed", but that it hasn't been for nefarious reasons. You then went on to discuss a method of eliminating the ratings system entirely through public television (how this eliminates the system I still don't know, since you would think public television would still want to show things that the most number of people would want to watch, and therefore would want to use Neilsen also). That appeared to be your "fix". If I am wrong about that, then so be it. But my being wrong didn't come from a lack of attention to what you have said. </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>More unecessary rudeness, and the second time you have taken such an extreme sarcastic stance. If this is going to continue, then I think the conversation should end here. I'm all in favor of a civil discussion, but not if you are going to get all catty.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 627300, member: 2525"] [B] If you PROMISE that, if proof is provided, you will concede on this discussion and drop it, then I will go get the proof. Otherwise, it would be futile - I would be wasting my precious hours digging up info just so you can say "I need more, that doesn't persuade me". Deal? I feel the percentage of sci-fi shows that are serialized is higher than non-sci-fi shows in a material way. Sure, there are episodic and serialied shows in all genres. I just think sci-fi has a significanltly higher perecentage than other genres. If you think your own arguement is not valid for Firefly...then why did you bring it up in THIS thread? Please don't be rude. That's the second time you have accused me of not paying sufficient attention to what you say, and you were wrong the first time so I would think you would be a bit mor polite about it the second time. We are having a discussion. We are going point by point, through dozens of points. If someone misses one thing, or misinterprets one thing, it doesn't mean they were not paying attention to what you were saying. Please be polite. You've said this however "[i]If the system is broken now, it has been so for years. If the networks really were making a good faith effort to fix it, then it would have gotten fixed. They've had the money and the time, if they really wished to apply it.[/i]" So by implication you feel the system should have been "fixed", but that it hasn't been for nefarious reasons. You then went on to discuss a method of eliminating the ratings system entirely through public television (how this eliminates the system I still don't know, since you would think public television would still want to show things that the most number of people would want to watch, and therefore would want to use Neilsen also). That appeared to be your "fix". If I am wrong about that, then so be it. But my being wrong didn't come from a lack of attention to what you have said. More unecessary rudeness, and the second time you have taken such an extreme sarcastic stance. If this is going to continue, then I think the conversation should end here. I'm all in favor of a civil discussion, but not if you are going to get all catty.[/b] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Firefly cancelled!
Top