Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Firefly-help me out
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneLigon" data-source="post: 2460607" data-attributes="member: 3649"><p>Yeah, we don't know much about the terraforming tech used to make the Wedonverse moons shirt-sleeve habitable. Normally bodies like Titan would be too far from the Sun to terraform, but with giant mirrors to angle more sunlight to them it might be possible. A gas giant with a hotter internal termperature than Jupiter ofr Saturn has might be doable as well since it would radiate more heat out to the moons, though we don't have any indication that any of the worlds in this place orbit a gas giant - it would be kinda hard to miss the giant planet dominating the sky. </p><p> </p><p>Having the 'inner worlds' orbit a close gas giant would be doable, and you could have at least a couple in the fairly narrow band of habitability for humans (a hotter star will also have a slightly larger habitation band, I think - in general, though, it's easier to handle cold than heat). That could give you 20 or more worlds, some of which might be Earth-sized garden worlds while the rest are the barely-habitable scrub-covered wastelands we normally see on the show: planets made that can support life, if grudgingly. </p><p> </p><p>There are weirder possibilities, some of which would probably have required construction by a vastly advanced race: five planets that orbit each other without a central star, weird stuff like that. </p><p> </p><p>Now, most of this assumes that the Titus-Bode law is really a law, which as far as I know (it's been a long time since I've read most modern astronomy) it still seems to hold true. That's the thing that states that the orbital placement of planets we see is the way it probably is elsewhere - the last two or three planets we found in our system followed that law after it was proposed. Though I think Pluto doesn't? Anyway, Titus Bode might NOT old true, which means you could have planets bunched closer together in a star's habitable zone. That would be a very, very, very good thing for us.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneLigon, post: 2460607, member: 3649"] Yeah, we don't know much about the terraforming tech used to make the Wedonverse moons shirt-sleeve habitable. Normally bodies like Titan would be too far from the Sun to terraform, but with giant mirrors to angle more sunlight to them it might be possible. A gas giant with a hotter internal termperature than Jupiter ofr Saturn has might be doable as well since it would radiate more heat out to the moons, though we don't have any indication that any of the worlds in this place orbit a gas giant - it would be kinda hard to miss the giant planet dominating the sky. Having the 'inner worlds' orbit a close gas giant would be doable, and you could have at least a couple in the fairly narrow band of habitability for humans (a hotter star will also have a slightly larger habitation band, I think - in general, though, it's easier to handle cold than heat). That could give you 20 or more worlds, some of which might be Earth-sized garden worlds while the rest are the barely-habitable scrub-covered wastelands we normally see on the show: planets made that can support life, if grudgingly. There are weirder possibilities, some of which would probably have required construction by a vastly advanced race: five planets that orbit each other without a central star, weird stuff like that. Now, most of this assumes that the Titus-Bode law is really a law, which as far as I know (it's been a long time since I've read most modern astronomy) it still seems to hold true. That's the thing that states that the orbital placement of planets we see is the way it probably is elsewhere - the last two or three planets we found in our system followed that law after it was proposed. Though I think Pluto doesn't? Anyway, Titus Bode might NOT old true, which means you could have planets bunched closer together in a star's habitable zone. That would be a very, very, very good thing for us. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Firefly-help me out
Top