Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
First experience with 5th edition and Lost Mines of Phandelver (no spoilers)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oofta" data-source="post: 6881418" data-attributes="member: 6801845"><p>My definition of a fighter being a magic user is certainly different from yours. No matter how you fluff it, several of a fighter's powers (to me and everyone I ever played 4E with) felt like magic. It might be slightly more accurate to say they felt supernatural.</p><p></p><p>Why? Well, they were limited to x number of times, just like a vancian spellcaster. They often didn't have a logical explanation such as my fighter's Rain of Steel giving him an aura of auto damage. I know it was justified by saying my dwarf flailed his hammer around wildly, but that made zero sense. The fluff never explained how Come and Get It worked with non-sentient creatures.</p><p></p><p>Can you have descriptive text? Sure. But that doesn't make the fact that I can stun most enemies (assuming they were not immune to stun from any source) with my hammer whether or not they have a physiology that includes a brain a non-supernatural power.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope. Every class <em>can</em> use magic. A champion fighter is quite capable with nary a spell in sight.</p><p> </p><p>All I can say is that many of us would just shrug when the rogue cast what his player called "Cone of Daggers" spell (flurry of daggers?) because we all had a hard time envisioning anything but a cartoon/anime version of someone throwing daggers. Or a spell.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I have no problem with people liking different versions of the game. I just take issue with broad statements like "veteran players don't...". It will be true with some people and not others. </p><p></p><p>Just like some people like sushi* but I don't, some people will like different versions of the game. I just don't see the point of trashing a version of the game you hate. On a message board dedicated to that version of the game.</p><p></p><p><em>*If I hear one more person say "you just haven't had good sushi" I may have to slap them. I've tried sushi multiple times, sometimes paying an exorbitant amount of money for the privalege.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oofta, post: 6881418, member: 6801845"] My definition of a fighter being a magic user is certainly different from yours. No matter how you fluff it, several of a fighter's powers (to me and everyone I ever played 4E with) felt like magic. It might be slightly more accurate to say they felt supernatural. Why? Well, they were limited to x number of times, just like a vancian spellcaster. They often didn't have a logical explanation such as my fighter's Rain of Steel giving him an aura of auto damage. I know it was justified by saying my dwarf flailed his hammer around wildly, but that made zero sense. The fluff never explained how Come and Get It worked with non-sentient creatures. Can you have descriptive text? Sure. But that doesn't make the fact that I can stun most enemies (assuming they were not immune to stun from any source) with my hammer whether or not they have a physiology that includes a brain a non-supernatural power. Nope. Every class [I]can[/I] use magic. A champion fighter is quite capable with nary a spell in sight. All I can say is that many of us would just shrug when the rogue cast what his player called "Cone of Daggers" spell (flurry of daggers?) because we all had a hard time envisioning anything but a cartoon/anime version of someone throwing daggers. Or a spell. I have no problem with people liking different versions of the game. I just take issue with broad statements like "veteran players don't...". It will be true with some people and not others. Just like some people like sushi* but I don't, some people will like different versions of the game. I just don't see the point of trashing a version of the game you hate. On a message board dedicated to that version of the game. [I]*If I hear one more person say "you just haven't had good sushi" I may have to slap them. I've tried sushi multiple times, sometimes paying an exorbitant amount of money for the privalege.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
First experience with 5th edition and Lost Mines of Phandelver (no spoilers)
Top