Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
First official D&D game product you owned?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JEB" data-source="post: 8529698" data-attributes="member: 10148"><p><strong>UPDATE: If you got the 1991/1994 Basic set and had previously voted for the 1977/1981/1983 version, please change your vote!</strong> Those are now separate from the 1977/1981/1983 versions.</p><p></p><p>Curious about the first official D&D game product everyone here owned. (It can be a gift or a purchase, as long as it was yours to keep. ) What was it? How did you get it? What did you like most about it? (Or did you hate it?) Do you still have it? Please let us all know!</p><p></p><p>Laying down some ground rules:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I included an example of each category (in parentheses), but just to make it clearer:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A "general supplement" is something that expands on the rules for that edition without being explicitly tied to one setting.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A "setting-specific supplement" is a product that introduces or expands on a specific campaign setting, and is explicitly tied to that setting.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A "general adventure" is an adventure that isn't explicitly tied to one setting (which doesn't mean it isn't linked in some way to a setting; it just isn't labeled as a "Dragonlance" adventure or the like).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A "setting-specific adventure" is an adventure that is explicitly tied to one setting.</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">5e adventures weren't split into general vs. setting-specific because they're basically all setting-specific.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If a product fits into more than one category, pick the category that seems to fit best from the way the product was marketed (and please let us know that you weren't sure in your comments).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If you got more than one product in different categories at the same time, pick the one that made the strongest impression (but please let us know about the others).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">While this isn't technically a (+) thread (I wanted to leave it open for folks to bash their first product if they really wanted to), please be respectful towards everyone else's opinions, and please don't trash people for liking a thing you don't.</li> </ul><p>EDIT: Late notes:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The 2e core rules include the two original looseleaf Monstrous Compendiums as well as the Monstrous Manual (but not the various looseleaf MC Appendices).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">"D&D BECMI set (Expert/Companion/Master/Immortals)" only includes the expansions after the Basic set, not the "red box" itself.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I originally included the 1991 and 1994 revisions of the D&D Basic set in with the 1977/1981/1983 versions, but I have been persuaded to separate those out as their own answer (at the end of the list).</li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JEB, post: 8529698, member: 10148"] [B]UPDATE: If you got the 1991/1994 Basic set and had previously voted for the 1977/1981/1983 version, please change your vote![/B] Those are now separate from the 1977/1981/1983 versions. Curious about the first official D&D game product everyone here owned. (It can be a gift or a purchase, as long as it was yours to keep. ) What was it? How did you get it? What did you like most about it? (Or did you hate it?) Do you still have it? Please let us all know! Laying down some ground rules: [LIST] [*]I included an example of each category (in parentheses), but just to make it clearer: [LIST] [*]A "general supplement" is something that expands on the rules for that edition without being explicitly tied to one setting. [*]A "setting-specific supplement" is a product that introduces or expands on a specific campaign setting, and is explicitly tied to that setting. [*]A "general adventure" is an adventure that isn't explicitly tied to one setting (which doesn't mean it isn't linked in some way to a setting; it just isn't labeled as a "Dragonlance" adventure or the like). [*]A "setting-specific adventure" is an adventure that is explicitly tied to one setting. [/LIST] [*]5e adventures weren't split into general vs. setting-specific because they're basically all setting-specific. [*]If a product fits into more than one category, pick the category that seems to fit best from the way the product was marketed (and please let us know that you weren't sure in your comments). [*]If you got more than one product in different categories at the same time, pick the one that made the strongest impression (but please let us know about the others). [*]While this isn't technically a (+) thread (I wanted to leave it open for folks to bash their first product if they really wanted to), please be respectful towards everyone else's opinions, and please don't trash people for liking a thing you don't. [/LIST] EDIT: Late notes: [LIST] [*]The 2e core rules include the two original looseleaf Monstrous Compendiums as well as the Monstrous Manual (but not the various looseleaf MC Appendices). [*]"D&D BECMI set (Expert/Companion/Master/Immortals)" only includes the expansions after the Basic set, not the "red box" itself. [*]I originally included the 1991 and 1994 revisions of the D&D Basic set in with the 1977/1981/1983 versions, but I have been persuaded to separate those out as their own answer (at the end of the list). [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
First official D&D game product you owned?
Top