Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kobold Avenger" data-source="post: 8736441" data-attributes="member: 779">One problem with &quot;Aardlings&quot; is that excluding the Beastlands there aren't that many Beast-like CG Celestials. At the most there's Lillendi (who have humanoid upper torsos and snake lower torso with wings), Asuras (Mostly humanoid except for the wings and bird talon feet) and Tome of Battle Valkyrie (who can be described as Satyr-Angels). The most prevalent CG celestials are the Celestial Eladrins (aka Azata in Pathfinder) or whatever they're going to call them now (Sidhe?) who are all mostly Fey-like.And this is not counting the fact that about half of the Archon types are also human-like.I think that while Aardlings have animal features, some players would want to go full Furry, not necessarily everyone wants to go full Furry for such concepts.I think they should just collapse the concept into Aasimar. No having 2 different races.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kobold Avenger, post: 8736441, member: 779"] One problem with "Aardlings" is that excluding the Beastlands there aren't that many Beast-like CG Celestials. At the most there's Lillendi (who have humanoid upper torsos and snake lower torso with wings), Asuras (Mostly humanoid except for the wings and bird talon feet) and Tome of Battle Valkyrie (who can be described as Satyr-Angels). The most prevalent CG celestials are the Celestial Eladrins (aka Azata in Pathfinder) or whatever they're going to call them now (Sidhe?) who are all mostly Fey-like. And this is not counting the fact that about half of the Archon types are also human-like. I think that while Aardlings have animal features, some players would want to go full Furry, not necessarily everyone wants to go full Furry for such concepts. I think they should just collapse the concept into Aasimar. No having 2 different races. [/QUOTE]

Verification