Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
First playtest thread! One D&D Character Origins.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8737105" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Sure. But there were several people who argued that making feats non-optional was totally breaking any semblance of backwards compatibility. Or that they couldn't make any significant changes to classes, for the same reason.</p><p></p><p>This document pretty conclusively proves that, at the very least, "completely backwards compatible" does not mean "only minor/cosmetic changes or rearrangements of existing effects." This is a legit top-to-bottom re-evaluation. The fundamental underlying math isn't going to change (sadly), but their approach to how it works may do so.</p><p></p><p>That Healer feat, for example, actually looks almost kinda-sorta serviceable as a legit replacement for Cleric healing. I wouldn't be surprised if we see a new Fighter subclass, perhaps a rewrite (and redemption) of the Banneret/PDK, that gets Healer for free and leverages it for other benefits. If so, "One D&D" may be <em>very slightly</em> more of a "4e wasn't THAT bad" revision than I had thought.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh my God, that...that would be <em>so good</em>...I am legitimately kind of upset that that might happen, because I LOVE the concept of Iomandra and always wanted to play a game there. Which means I might have to play <s>5th edition</s> "One D&D" in order to get it...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 8737105, member: 6790260"] Sure. But there were several people who argued that making feats non-optional was totally breaking any semblance of backwards compatibility. Or that they couldn't make any significant changes to classes, for the same reason. This document pretty conclusively proves that, at the very least, "completely backwards compatible" does not mean "only minor/cosmetic changes or rearrangements of existing effects." This is a legit top-to-bottom re-evaluation. The fundamental underlying math isn't going to change (sadly), but their approach to how it works may do so. That Healer feat, for example, actually looks almost kinda-sorta serviceable as a legit replacement for Cleric healing. I wouldn't be surprised if we see a new Fighter subclass, perhaps a rewrite (and redemption) of the Banneret/PDK, that gets Healer for free and leverages it for other benefits. If so, "One D&D" may be [I]very slightly[/I] more of a "4e wasn't THAT bad" revision than I had thought. Oh my God, that...that would be [I]so good[/I]...I am legitimately kind of upset that that might happen, because I LOVE the concept of Iomandra and always wanted to play a game there. Which means I might have to play [S]5th edition[/S] "One D&D" in order to get it... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
First playtest thread! One D&D Character Origins.
Top