Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
First TPK Players got frustrated
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hillsy7" data-source="post: 7166454" data-attributes="member: 6689191"><p>Ok - might as well chuck in my tuppenceworth......</p><p></p><p>First off, watch your cognitive bias - you're very first line states "This happened because the players". This immediately says you don't think it's your fault, or an unfortunately happenstance, and therefore you're not in the mindset for discussion, only validation. It's ok and perfectly natural (everyone does it), but I'd definitely say take a moment to open your mind to the possibility everything is your fault. It's almost certainly not, but you should be prepared to accept the possibility.</p><p></p><p>A rough rule of thumb is: <strong>let players suffer the consequences of their decisions, not their mistakes.</strong></p><p></p><p>What does that mean? A quick definition.....</p><p></p><p>A <strong>Mistake </strong>is the incorrect assessment of the situation due to misinterpretation of, lack of knowledge of, or forgetting about, the facts.</p><p>A <strong>Decision </strong> is made by analysis all the facts, and choosing to place more importance or emphasis upon one or the other to justify a course of action.</p><p></p><p>So in this instance, the players appear to have made a few mistakes.......</p><p>1) They thought the dungeon was dynamic. Threats in a room would stay in that room.</p><p>2) They thought they'd mitigated other threats. They thought they'd remain undetected until the fight was done.</p><p>3) They misread the difficulty of the upcoming fight and the BBEG's power level.</p><p>4) They hadn't properly planned for an exit strategy, not realising they might need one.</p><p></p><p>They then made some decisions.......</p><p>1) They assessed their abilities, and came up with a combat strategy to win the fight.</p><p>2) Faced with how the fight was going, they had to choose between fighting on, or running.</p><p></p><p>Generally speaking, most mistakes are understandable except when you know all of the facts. In your case as the GM, you do. You know that not searching every room means they won't understand the scale of the threat. You know the kobald's they deliberately ignored (If that's what you meant by skipping rooms on purpose) were going to patrol and/or react within seconds once the fight started. You know that the kobald's will attempt to block escape. You know a good strategy is vital to kill the BBEG........However, your job as GM is to hand out these facts to the players <strong>only when they find them,</strong> and if they don't have all the facts, they are guessing, or assuming, rather than choosing to do something where they know there's risk involved.</p><p></p><p>So here you can see the problem. Correctly you let them face the consequences of their decisions. Their plan wasn't good enough, the consequence for this was they got beat up. Good. Then they chose to run, and the consequence of this was not "winning" and leaving their friend. However, what ultimately killed them, and what feels like a 'gotcha' or unfair, is you made them suffer for their earlier Mistakes. This is the root of the problem.</p><p></p><p>A very simple analogy is you present the players with two rooms, each contains a key. They have a black box with the word "Noctum" written on it. They go into the first room, find a key with "Helios" on it, and open the box. A powerful demon pops out and kills them immediately. In the other room is a key with "Noctum" on it, they didn't get to. Now had they found both keys, they might've made a different choice. Had they searched the library they might've found an old tale about a demon in a box and how it's his name that traps him. Maybe they might've made a history check and heard about this tale. Maybe they'd take it to the local wizard......but no. They were presented with a key and a box and made the reasonable assumption one opened the other, not knowing all the things you the GM know. Now they are dead.</p><p></p><p>Everything up to the point the demon appeared were simple mistakes. However, if the Demon appears, gives them a speech about his vast ancient power, you make the players roll religion checks and inform them this dude looks properly, 20+ level badass, and they STILL choose to fight? Cool, let them die. That was their choice.</p><p></p><p></p><p>.......That's my opinion on the matter anyway, FWIW......</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hillsy7, post: 7166454, member: 6689191"] Ok - might as well chuck in my tuppenceworth...... First off, watch your cognitive bias - you're very first line states "This happened because the players". This immediately says you don't think it's your fault, or an unfortunately happenstance, and therefore you're not in the mindset for discussion, only validation. It's ok and perfectly natural (everyone does it), but I'd definitely say take a moment to open your mind to the possibility everything is your fault. It's almost certainly not, but you should be prepared to accept the possibility. A rough rule of thumb is: [B]let players suffer the consequences of their decisions, not their mistakes.[/B] What does that mean? A quick definition..... A [B]Mistake [/B]is the incorrect assessment of the situation due to misinterpretation of, lack of knowledge of, or forgetting about, the facts. A [B]Decision [/B] is made by analysis all the facts, and choosing to place more importance or emphasis upon one or the other to justify a course of action. So in this instance, the players appear to have made a few mistakes....... 1) They thought the dungeon was dynamic. Threats in a room would stay in that room. 2) They thought they'd mitigated other threats. They thought they'd remain undetected until the fight was done. 3) They misread the difficulty of the upcoming fight and the BBEG's power level. 4) They hadn't properly planned for an exit strategy, not realising they might need one. They then made some decisions....... 1) They assessed their abilities, and came up with a combat strategy to win the fight. 2) Faced with how the fight was going, they had to choose between fighting on, or running. Generally speaking, most mistakes are understandable except when you know all of the facts. In your case as the GM, you do. You know that not searching every room means they won't understand the scale of the threat. You know the kobald's they deliberately ignored (If that's what you meant by skipping rooms on purpose) were going to patrol and/or react within seconds once the fight started. You know that the kobald's will attempt to block escape. You know a good strategy is vital to kill the BBEG........However, your job as GM is to hand out these facts to the players [B]only when they find them,[/B] and if they don't have all the facts, they are guessing, or assuming, rather than choosing to do something where they know there's risk involved. So here you can see the problem. Correctly you let them face the consequences of their decisions. Their plan wasn't good enough, the consequence for this was they got beat up. Good. Then they chose to run, and the consequence of this was not "winning" and leaving their friend. However, what ultimately killed them, and what feels like a 'gotcha' or unfair, is you made them suffer for their earlier Mistakes. This is the root of the problem. A very simple analogy is you present the players with two rooms, each contains a key. They have a black box with the word "Noctum" written on it. They go into the first room, find a key with "Helios" on it, and open the box. A powerful demon pops out and kills them immediately. In the other room is a key with "Noctum" on it, they didn't get to. Now had they found both keys, they might've made a different choice. Had they searched the library they might've found an old tale about a demon in a box and how it's his name that traps him. Maybe they might've made a history check and heard about this tale. Maybe they'd take it to the local wizard......but no. They were presented with a key and a box and made the reasonable assumption one opened the other, not knowing all the things you the GM know. Now they are dead. Everything up to the point the demon appeared were simple mistakes. However, if the Demon appears, gives them a speech about his vast ancient power, you make the players roll religion checks and inform them this dude looks properly, 20+ level badass, and they STILL choose to fight? Cool, let them die. That was their choice. .......That's my opinion on the matter anyway, FWIW...... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
First TPK Players got frustrated
Top