Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Levistus's_Leviathan" data-source="post: 8653380" data-attributes="member: 7023887">I'd rather have a setting be &quot;disingenuous&quot; or &quot;not faithful&quot; to its original content than have it include racist, sexist, homophobic, and ableist content (which many popular older settings have). I'd rather have people that like the base ideas of those settings be able to play them in a slightly different way from the original than doom the original to be forgotten or force WotC to publish the older setting exactly as originally published with all of its problematic/outdated content. I'd rather have fun with a slightly changed version of an older setting than never get to experience that setting in my preferred ruleset because some older players get grumpy at me for not playing how they want me to. I'd rather D&amp;D prosper and evolve than stagnate and die because someone on the internet complained about minor changes.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Levistus's_Leviathan, post: 8653380, member: 7023887"] I'd rather have a setting be "disingenuous" or "not faithful" to its original content than have it include racist, sexist, homophobic, and ableist content (which many popular older settings have). I'd rather have people that like the base ideas of those settings be able to play them in a slightly different way from the original than doom the original to be forgotten or force WotC to publish the older setting exactly as originally published with all of its problematic/outdated content. I'd rather have fun with a slightly changed version of an older setting than never get to experience that setting in my preferred ruleset because some older players get grumpy at me for not playing how they want me to. I'd rather D&D prosper and evolve than stagnate and die because someone on the internet complained about minor changes. [/QUOTE]

Verification