Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Five Alignments?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 4246239" data-attributes="member: 19675"><p>OK, with that understanding, we can proceed!</p><p></p><p></p><p>Which I stated I don't.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Which I don't. Its different, not better or worse.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>1) ...meaning that you have several ways of interpreting the ethical landscape of the 5 point system of 4Ed, which isn't nearly as useful as an undistinguished 3 point or a more delineated 9 point system.</p><p></p><p>2) I don't believe that people are fundamentally chaotic- especially the good ones.</p><p></p><p>Which brings up</p><p></p><p>3) If indeed people <em>are</em> fundamentally chaotic, then the 4Ed system should be LG-G-U-E-<strong><em>LE</em>.</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>and</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And that, IMHO, is a serious flaw, which is also at odds with your sentence immediately precedent (in the seperate quote).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>To you, perhaps. To me, it meant that alignment mattered <em>a lot.</em></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>IME, LG and CE are no less numerous or qualitatively different than beings on other axes of the alignment tree- LE and CE characters show up in games and fiction in numbers and characterizational contrast as much as the 4Ed alingments still enshrined.</p><p></p><p>If you want to talk <em>rarity,</em> the neutral or unaligned person is probably rarest of all.</p><p></p><p>Quote:</p><p></p><p></p><p>1) To do otherwise is utterly arbitrary in a way that no game with an alignment system should be...as I pointed out in my food pyramid example.</p><p></p><p>2) It linguistically diminishes the importance of other viewpoints within the system, and that inherently affects player perspectives. Words have meaning, and meanings matter.</p><p></p><p>Proverbs 18:31 teaches: “Mavet v’hayyim b’yad halashon – Death and life are in the power of the tongue.”</p><p></p><p>Meaning that if you label someone (or in 4Ed, something) one way, it becomes worth preserving, another way, it is easily discarded. Whether one is discussing racism or psychopathy, that is one of the fundamental points of the psychology of killing humans.</p><p></p><p>Both the psychopath and the racist use epithets that diminish the humanity of "the other." It is one of the reasons why you are often advised to humanize yourself by using your name or family photos, etc. when dealing with the criminally insane- by doing this, you maintain existential parity with your would-be assailant by keeping yourself raised above the level of an object he seeks to destroy.</p><p></p><p>Here, the 4Ed system- intentionally or not- linguistically erases certain viewpoints from the game, and by doing so, minimizes the odds that those unnamed viewpoints will be represented. Its not people getting killed, its ethical perspectives.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 4246239, member: 19675"] OK, with that understanding, we can proceed! Which I stated I don't. Which I don't. Its different, not better or worse. 1) ...meaning that you have several ways of interpreting the ethical landscape of the 5 point system of 4Ed, which isn't nearly as useful as an undistinguished 3 point or a more delineated 9 point system. 2) I don't believe that people are fundamentally chaotic- especially the good ones. Which brings up 3) If indeed people [I]are[/I] fundamentally chaotic, then the 4Ed system should be LG-G-U-E-[B][I]LE[/I].[/B] and And that, IMHO, is a serious flaw, which is also at odds with your sentence immediately precedent (in the seperate quote). To you, perhaps. To me, it meant that alignment mattered [I]a lot.[/I] IME, LG and CE are no less numerous or qualitatively different than beings on other axes of the alignment tree- LE and CE characters show up in games and fiction in numbers and characterizational contrast as much as the 4Ed alingments still enshrined. If you want to talk [I]rarity,[/I] the neutral or unaligned person is probably rarest of all. Quote: 1) To do otherwise is utterly arbitrary in a way that no game with an alignment system should be...as I pointed out in my food pyramid example. 2) It linguistically diminishes the importance of other viewpoints within the system, and that inherently affects player perspectives. Words have meaning, and meanings matter. Proverbs 18:31 teaches: “Mavet v’hayyim b’yad halashon – Death and life are in the power of the tongue.” Meaning that if you label someone (or in 4Ed, something) one way, it becomes worth preserving, another way, it is easily discarded. Whether one is discussing racism or psychopathy, that is one of the fundamental points of the psychology of killing humans. Both the psychopath and the racist use epithets that diminish the humanity of "the other." It is one of the reasons why you are often advised to humanize yourself by using your name or family photos, etc. when dealing with the criminally insane- by doing this, you maintain existential parity with your would-be assailant by keeping yourself raised above the level of an object he seeks to destroy. Here, the 4Ed system- intentionally or not- linguistically erases certain viewpoints from the game, and by doing so, minimizes the odds that those unnamed viewpoints will be represented. Its not people getting killed, its ethical perspectives. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Five Alignments?
Top